有冇ONKYO 用家用過BI_AMP或者BRIDGE 個FRONT SPEAKERS?
本人UPGRADE 左做5007~~~見佢MANUAL 話可以BIAMP 或者BRIDGE,而我用緊KLIPSCH RB-81 II, 係可以BI_AMP 的~~~
我GOOGLE 過有關既POST, 好多人都話兩樣都唔好,會衰聲....
有冇CHING 做過A/B TEST 呢?~~
THX Wa no A/B test wor 我諗ching係想問的a/b係有用同冇用的分別. 我用左5007行bi-amp好耐, 唔覺會衰聲, 正式用之前都有比較駁bi-amp同唔駁. ching你自己試下玩玩冇壞, 最緊要試得開心, 同埋要搵埋屋企人試仲好玩(唔好暗示比佢地知你攪d咩) 衰聲??ok wor, 我用3007 bi-amp推dali ikon 6，比較唔用bi-amp，d聲細緻左，有力左，但d高音有少少硬同尖，我諗可以換線攪攪佢。 I have tried that before on my Onkyo 705 with Bi Amp, the first impression was the speakers sound more powerful and good for movie.
But I didn't compare any effect on the sound "quality" with CD songs... 小弟608用Bi-amp 去隻 Quad Lite, 感覺大聲左同細緻左 初初買5007時兩個BIAMP或BRIDGE都試過, 感覺BIAMP好啲, 分析力比較好, 但都係買個後級實際 Yeah Bi-Amp is good, try it! 咁多ching都話biamp好用~~咁我又try try 先
但好似無咩ching用bridge? 咁多ching都話biamp好用~~咁我又try try 先
但好似無咩ching用bridge?
lawsun 發表於 2011-5-31 10:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
自用後級之後，有所啓發， bi-amp有得有失，bi-amp由於用多一份功放推動喇叭，喇叭動態各方面都有所提升，同一時間也用盡avamp 的功能，所以avamp 各方面表現會下降.......！
由於 avamp 工作多咗，分析力也會差咗，但bi-amp用avamp 兩聲道聽歌時，係會有明顯改善，如果想真正有改善.....加後級{:6_222:} {:6_222:}
頁:
[1]