問問買二手懷了後,如何修理?
amuroman 發表於 2011-4-24 00:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
可以買零件俾人或自己整，
網上好多M&K 零件賣
唔駛擔心，m&k 質量好好
講梗第一代S150 到而家到過十年，好多師兄都用梗
求解M&K S150 LCR 和MK S150 LCR (聲音)的分別?
求解M&K S150 LCR 和MK S150 LCR (聲音)的分別?
amuroman 發表於 2011-4-25 00:03 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
一定要分別的話是m&k的中音比mk好少少.不過都是1至2%左右.同M&K現在都冇.
一定要分別的話是m&k的中音比mk好少少.不過都是1至2%左右.同M&K現在都冇. ...
kenny238 發表於 2011-4-25 12:36 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
1,2%{:6_200:}
你打少個0.....
1,2%
你打少個0.....
鐵心心 發表於 2011-4-25 12:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
有冇今大分別?頂多3至8%左右.換條線都分別大過佢.
有冇今大分別?頂多3至8%左右.換條線都分別大過佢.
kenny238 發表於 2011-4-25 12:51 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
3-8%,你唔會覺得有分別的
3-8%,你唔會覺得有分別的
鐵心心 發表於 2011-4-25 12:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實可以話冇分別.係出面d人一定要分別之麻.M&K在美國破產都冇這間公司.d人成日講以前的M&K喇叭好過現在的.這點我都同意,以前做喇叭的源材料一定好過現在,現在的一定冇今好,m&K冇左,d人有M&K以前的喇叭咪講m&K比mk好囉.
其實可以話冇分別.係出面d人一定要分別之麻.M&K在美國破產都冇這間公司.d人成日講以前的M&K喇叭好過 ...
kenny238 發表於 2011-4-25 13:20 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_200:}
其實可以話冇分別.係出面d人一定要分別之麻.M&K在美國破產都冇這間公司.d人成日講以前的M&K喇叭好過 ...
kenny238 發表於 2011-4-25 13:20 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_193:} 好~!!!敢言!!!{:6_189:}
其實可以話冇分別.係出面d人一定要分別之麻.M&K在美國破產都冇這間公司.d人成日講以前的M&K喇叭好過 ...
kenny238 發表於 2011-4-25 13:20 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I agree with the par the about the ppl make better speakers in the old days. I have / had both M&K and MK, i think better look at it as 2 different brand. And i think the diff between M&K and MK is atleast over 30 to ~ 40% different ( that include the sound, specs , materials , QC and most importantly the price ). Just my 2pc. If MK can sell cheaper , that would be great too hehe.
