LCD 成本平, 食水深....好賺.PLASMA最細都要42吋 , 要靚又成本高,,,,, 你係老闆會賣邊樣 .
LCD 成本平, 食水深....好賺.PLASMA最細都要42吋 , 要靚又成本高,,,,, 你係老闆會賣邊樣 .
Agree!!
Plasma Good Good Good
想問下, 同價位plasma好過LCD, 點解LCD會成為主流, 又咁多生產商唔造Plasma?純好奇問下 ...
lausl 發表於 2011-4-14 22:24 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
同樣道理,AV Processors靚聲過AV Receivers,但AV Receivers是主流。
p 記 plasma 全機保用5年,用料靓, LED LCD 邊間夠膽保咁耐
想問下, 同價位plasma好過LCD, 點解LCD會成為主流, 又咁多生產商唔造Plasma?純好奇問下 ...
lausl 發表於 2011-4-14 22:24 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Because most people can't distinguish/understand what good picture quality is whilst they are in the shops.
On first sight, LCD/LED look better to many people under the bright showroom conditions because of their superior brightness, especially up close where LCD/LED look sharper and cleaner when compared to plasma.
Under normal/home conditions, plasmas are often superior.
LCD 成本平, 食水深....好賺.PLASMA最細都要42吋 , 要靚又成本高,,,,, 你係老闆會賣邊樣 . ...
里奧 發表於 2011-4-14 22:49 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
讚成{:1_245:}
買3D定2D???
Plasma 雖然牌子冇也選擇,但睇落好自然同隻睇好舒服。我用42" 80H.
電影感都已經好過lcd先啦!
Plasma la X100 , but 熱d, 厚d, 耗電量高d it's ture , also plasma 畫質一流. 我睇 avater . 靚到形容唔到X10
