因為無一間有齊denon and pioneer, 所以無得作比較
回復 11# kei68
it is always difficult to compare different brandname without actually listening base on the same set of speaker. As recall, i really can't figure out any shops around which could provide both denon and pioneer for listening purposes (and of coz, politely to provide such service) around with speaker performs simliarly like the klipsch.. Any Ching any idea?!? {:6_146:}
阿二好似有
電影聲低 {:1_253:}
你真係要試試...
傑士其實專係for 電影...
高音尖..低音量多...不過質就唔多dim...可以有好大音壓...horn 高音...
本帖最後由 vc113 於 2010-12-4 00:44 編輯
高音尖既係咪應該咪夾onkyo or denon既厚聲呢~ 而 b&w 夾 pioneer 既高分析力同快聲取其平均呢
本帖最後由 ronan 於 2010-12-4 12:45 編輯
Klipsch 聲音尖，主要同HORN 喇叭有關，因為HORN 喇叭係由大聲公喇叭演變出黎，好處係SENSIVIEITY 高，即易推，高音擴散度好，但唔好處係音質會好METALLIC ，好聽就話戲院FEEL ，唔好聽就話係大聲公FEEL
紅館用的喇叭係HORN 黎，所以睇concert 時，你會覺得高音幾尖，但又唔會刺耳
而KEF 同MISSION 果D 高音就真係尖得黎刺耳
個人認為ONKYO 係薄聲，而高音亦都較尖同較硬
美國喇叭最好配馬仔，又或者harmon 呢d 影音較為平均的av amp
thx, so detail, o think i will choose denon
先鋒之所以中性，雖然高頻收斂但中低頻仲系好有力度嘅 針對傑士喇叭嘅高頻亮麗中低頻收斂嘅特啲，所以選先鋒系比較合適嘅，有個互補嘅作用
Klipsch 聲音尖，主要同HORN 喇叭有關，因為HORN 喇叭係由大聲公喇叭演變出黎，好處係SENSIVIEITY 高，即易 ...
ronan 發表於 2010-12-4 01:09 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
同意HORN說法
但都係唔同意安穚薄聲說法{:6_183:}
