koo9726
發表於 2010-10-11 22:46
都係買左 Impact 10 係 MK 德發地庫
price $2,6))
eggcake92 發表於 2010-10-11 22:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
快D出報告
karl1985
發表於 2010-10-11 22:52
恭喜恭喜{:6_128:}
期待報告{:6_178:}
thomas430
發表於 2010-10-11 23:02
{:6_196:}恭喜
leo25
發表於 2010-10-12 01:02
等你包膠 {:6_238:}
juan
發表於 2010-10-12 09:25
恭喜{:6_195:}
期待報告{:6_237:}
danny73
發表於 2010-10-12 09:29
包膠,包膠, impact10 or 8Q I'm {:6_201:}still struggling ..........
lyl223
發表於 2010-10-12 10:31
恭喜 C-hing, waiting report
wrxgc8
發表於 2010-10-12 10:37
恭喜...ching.report{:6_190:}
jasonhh
發表於 2010-10-12 11:05
包膠,包膠, impact10 or 8Q I'm still struggling ..........
danny73 發表於 2010-10-12 09:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
i've been using impact 10 for 6months....below is my little comment~~
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=23751&rpid=799576&ordertype=0&page=11#pid799576
- I tried both at central 'yuen yum' (with exact same AV AMP setting & SUB volume at 12o'clock),
- 8Q definitely KO impact 10 in terms of output 量 by 九條街
- 8Q bass totally fill-up the whole showroom with good punch while impact10 could not do that
- But i feel impact10 is able to go a little bit deeper & its bass sound 'cleaner' (or maybe coz it's weaker in power??), but i guess if do proper EQ setup in the 8Q (which impact10 does not have), 8Q will have clean bass too
- as their price difference is less then 1K, i personally think 8Q has better C/P (8Q also has remote control!) if buy new
- i finally bought impact10 because i happened to find super good deal from 2nd hand at that time {:1_351:}
ey731
發表於 2010-10-12 11:56
包膠,包膠, impact10 or 8Q I'm still struggling ..........
danny73 發表於 2010-10-12 09:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
睇完呢個 post, 我都 stru...