CM5 ? CM7?
本帖最後由 dandan 於 2010-9-17 01:14 編輯點解冇咩ching講cm5?
是否cm7>cm1>cm5?
上星期去過尖咀showroom, 聽cm5幾好.....再聽cm7都唔錯.....
peter話$cm5+$stand=$cm7(差唔多)....
大家覺得......比啲意見!!!{:6_141:} 因為CM5 個價唔湯唔水law.....除非放唔落座地,放得落一定買CM7{:6_175:} not sleep ar ching{:6_160:}
listen music, bookshelf is better than stand
i listen music >> movie 我用緊cm5，一開始買放係地櫃上面無用釘,太多共震聲...之後買stand 返黎未灌沙已好好多，應該話地方大就cm7,細就cm5 bookself 易發揮d。 not sleep ar ching
listen music, bookshelf is better than stand
i listen music >> movie ...
dandan 發表於 2010-9-17 01:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Why Ching have this thinking?{:6_141:} most Hi-End speaker are floor stand wor.{:6_128:} {:6_128:} not sleep ar ching
listen music, bookshelf is better than stand
i listen music >> movie ...
dandan 發表於 2010-9-17 01:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
一定唔係啦...........
but
書架真係易擺好用 d 用得落座地咁梗係用座地啦!音場包圍感都唔同啦!{:6_238:} 本帖最後由 babuwa 於 2010-9-17 11:38 編輯
一定唔係啦...........
but
書架真係易擺好用 d
SUGIZO 發表於 2010-9-17 10:50 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Agree!! use bookself because $$ or listen space limitation. so, I use Big bookself.{:6_184:} 用得落座地咁梗係用座地啦!音場包圍感都唔同啦!
KING 發表於 2010-9-17 11:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Total Agree!!{:6_238:} Total Agree!!
babuwa 發表於 2010-9-17 11:38 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
哈哈!danda兄食得落既!一於CM7啦!{:6_190:}