SUGIZO
發表於 2010-9-13 10:26
正......{:1_253:}
babuwa
發表於 2010-9-13 11:29
回覆babuwa
upgrade版 ?~ 我上Fortress網見己經有得賣,返而無8004,會唔因為價錢差不多? ...
hkslash 發表於 2010-9-13 01:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
It's because both base on same model, HK agent don't let us buy cheaper one (8004) since it will affect KI Peral Lite sales.{:6_202:}If 8004 really come, it should be cheaper.{:6_210:}
babuwa
發表於 2010-9-13 11:53
C hing: Any idea on the street price of this black Pearl Lite?
fun100 發表於 2010-9-13 08:40 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Amp have Ching quote 8K. SACD player don't know.{:6_180:}
ANWKLO
發表於 2010-9-13 12:02
Amp have Ching quote 8K. SACD player don't know.
babuwa 發表於 2010-9-13 11:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
May be same price as amp{:1_342:}
"KI Pearl Lites
When the Original KI Pearl were first introduced last year, they were universally acknowledged as supremely exquisite high audio gems. Not only did they take music sensations to new heights, they were the ideal tribute to Ken Ishiwata’s 30-year association with Marantz. At special listening demonstrations across the globe, music lovers were first captivated and then totally spellbound by their supreme performance. However, as a highly exclusive limited edition, they were also beyond the reach of many.
That’s why Marantz decided to reuse all that had been discovered in developing the original Pearls to create the KI Pearl Lites. So that more people could take part. Importantly, the new Lites embody the same passion, the same commitment, and the same emotion as the original Limited Edition. Only the exterior design is different, their performance is still sublime."
babuwa
發表於 2010-9-13 12:03
May be same price as amp
"KI Pearl Lites
When the Original KI Pearl were first introdu ...
ANWKLO 發表於 2010-9-13 12:02 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
May be la.....{:6_179:} {:6_179:}
clarkwan
發表於 2010-9-13 20:57
KI pearl version, any different?
better sound?...if it is a lot better I will go for KI PEAR lite
babuwa
發表於 2010-9-13 21:09
KI pearl version, any different?
better sound?...if it is a lot better I will go for KI PEAR lite
clarkwan 發表於 2010-9-13 20:57 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
KI PEARL lite were lower grade than KI pearl, which is more afforadable.{:6_210:}
ANWKLO
發表於 2010-9-13 21:22
KI pearl version, any different?
better sound?...if it is a lot better I will go for KI PEAR lite
clarkwan 發表於 2010-9-13 20:57 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
According to Ken Ishiwata's introduction, only the external design and chassis are different, the internal are the same{:1_351:} If I were you, I would definitely go for Pearl Lite, much more affordable{:1_343:}
babuwa
發表於 2010-9-13 21:35
According to Ken Ishiwata's introduction, only the external design and chassis are different, the...
ANWKLO 發表於 2010-9-13 21:22 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Should not be same as KI Pearl la....{:6_138:} {:6_138:}since KI Pearl were base on 15 series modification. KI Pearl Lite base on 8004, so, they should not be the same.{:6_175:}
ANWKLO
發表於 2010-9-13 22:57
Should not be same as KI Pearl la.... since KI Pearl were base on 15 seri ...
babuwa 發表於 2010-9-13 21:35 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
According to Ken Ishiwata's introduction, KI Pearl Lite internally, engineering and execution are very close to KI Pearl. In fact, the internal of KI Pearl Lite looks like KI Pearl rather than PM15{:1_351:}