本帖最後由 ANWKLO 於 2010-8-20 13:18 編輯
NAD 反而有AV Bypass,不過外觀"沉實"D囉
babuwa 發表於 2010-8-20 00:46 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
NAD是否好力水的? 板面是否用膠製造{:1_342:}
今日聽過cambridge-650A........唔錯喎
都係環牛....無AV BYPASS,不過依樣其實對我都可有可無
............ ...
sharpmd 發表於 2010-8-19 22:12 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
650A{:1_342:}好多師兄用過640A{:1_343:}
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=45763
我用緊 NAD C372
真係好好力............
我用緊 NAD C372
真係好好力............
eggcake92 發表於 2010-8-20 13:20 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
師兄推QUAD 22L ?
屋企地方又細,用O記806推緊MISSION細喇叭都夠用,日後都唔會換座地喇叭......又唔會換大屋....哈哈
Why Ching think AV BYPASS 可有可無?
babuwa 發表於 2010-8-20 00:50 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我推緊隻 ENERGY RC70
開到 9:00 位置 要停 la
屋企地方又細,用O記806推緊MISSION細喇叭都夠用,日後都唔會換座地喇叭......又唔會換大屋....哈哈
...
sharpmd 發表於 2010-8-20 13:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Agreed with bro babuwa, AV Bypass is a must!
AV Bypass is not important if:
(a) you don't watch movie anymore
(b) you have another pair of speakers
(c) you don't mind to plug/unplug between AV amp and Stereo amp
If you don't need AV Bypass, I suggest you can also think about tube amp, can beat most of the same price range.
NAD 反而有AV Bypass,不過外觀"沉實"D囉
babuwa 發表於 2010-8-20 00:46 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
NAD有AV-bypass? 邊個model有呀？
本帖最後由 babuwa 於 2010-8-20 14:51 編輯
NAD是否好力水的? 板面是否用膠製造
ANWKLO 發表於 2010-8-20 13:13 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I'm not sure since they have silver color, may be metal panel.
