aidan 發表於 2010-8-16 21:26

回復 29# JamesK

唔洗客氣
FF=Full Frame全片幅 (D700, D3 or D3s)

macjuju 發表於 2010-8-16 21:39

回復 23# JamesK

有的, 就係 AF-S 35/1.8G

吹水 Ken 講既 35/2D vs 35/1.8G
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/35mm-f18.htm#compared

The Nikon 35mm f/2 AF-D was introduced 20 years ago in 1989, and is still sold today.
It uses the old mechanical AF system. It won't autofocus on the D40, D40X or D60. (重有新果D 3000/5000/ 所有 DX 系統)
When it does autofocus, as it will on the F6, D50, D70, D80, D90 and etc., the focus ring turns and you have to keep your hands off of it.
If you're counting pixels, the 35/2D is not as sharp as the new 35mm f/1.8G, but it does cover film and FX if you plan to upgrade.

I'd pass on the 35/2 unless you're shooting film or FX today. For DX, the $199 35/1.8G is so good I'd not wish the clunky mechanical focus of the 35/2 on you if you're shooting DX and could use the 35/1.8G.

我就會話如果係用 DX Format 既機, 又唔會花太多錢買鏡話, 35/1.8G 呢支一定係必買.
當年試玩過 50/1.8, 係就係七舊水 (當時價錢) 大光圈, 但用落係 DX機度, 唔知點咁.. 而且鏡頭有價, 真係唔啱賣番出去咩當幾舊水租鏡玩下囉....

而乜係 DX Format? 太多人講了, 不如自己睇 - 易睇的.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_DX_format

JamesK 發表於 2010-8-16 22:19

回復 32# macjuju
macjuju兄,
Thank you so much! The link contains so much useful information!!! {:6_196:}
I guess I could make decision after reading it.
頁: 1 2 3 [4]
查看完整版本: NIKKOR LENS AF 35mm f/2D

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。