turbochan
發表於 2010-8-17 21:31
唉~~~
點解會咁架, MK 又好 M&K 又好,我都係想分享一"下"
你話M&K好聲又如何,依家係~~我~~買唔係~~你~~
cc2008
發表於 2010-8-17 21:38
Turbo Hing,don't bothered by that kind of commend.
Enjoy your new toys. {:6_143:}
ben13
發表於 2010-8-17 21:38
Ching唔好理咁多,你講得好岩!係你買,又唔係佢買。最緊要自已開心!
係呢,想知道Elac + MK 效果點樣!
faihi
發表於 2010-8-17 21:54
勁開心! 玩得開心D!{:1_335:}
turbochan
發表於 2010-8-17 22:13
我真係無咁蠢呀! 佢有佢講, 我有我玩.
Elac + MK 效果係快鬥快, 前,後的音場好一致.
包圍感好好,但後置的高音比較尖,可能係同SC-LX82有關,要再仔細SETUP過.
ben13
發表於 2010-8-17 22:40
咁就再次恭喜Ching。{:6_193:}
marvintai
發表於 2010-8-17 23:11
回復 45# turbochan
ching,
Enjoy your "MK"....I owned both "MK" and "M&K" speakers, they both are very high performance and quality AV speakers.
But I do believe there are many other brands of speakers (JBL, JMLab, B&W, Emotiva,..etc) that can produce a very excellent AV sound stage, even better than "M&K"!!!
chhanthony
發表於 2010-8-17 23:16
我真係無咁蠢呀! 佢有佢講, 我有我玩.
Elac + MK 效果係快鬥快, 前,後的音場好一致.
包圍感好好,但後置的高 ...
turbochan 發表於 2010-8-17 22:13 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
買多部2ch power amp去推前之前用parasound推surround...攪掂
CrazyBull
發表於 2010-8-17 23:36
我真係無咁蠢呀! 佢有佢講, 我有我玩.
Elac + MK 效果係快鬥快, 前,後的音場好一致.
包圍感好好,但後置的高 ...
turbochan 發表於 17/8/2010 10:13 PM http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
c兄只要玩得開心就夠,其他閒言閒語吾駛放o係心!
多謝分享
10bucks360
發表於 2010-8-18 00:12
其實大家都係河蟹討論唧
冇話一定咩係最好, 咩係差好多, 當然每個人都有自己既立場同喜好
和諧討論也不能接受嗎?
樓主拎件新玩具出黎分享, 如果只能接受正面讚賞
負面既意見就不可討論, 咁請一早係最頂頭提出
免得有心討論器材既網友入來討論
一早說明, 所有人入來都是讚好的, 不就皆大歡喜嗎?