tuktuk
發表於 2010-4-9 17:44
如果你由886換,一定試下byebye曰本聲啦,補多小小去換11a,包你完全唔同哂,呢個台都唔小ching換咗啦.. ...
hw1723 發表於 2010-4-9 17:40 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I am planning too. but it is not "only 補多小小"{:1_247:}
hw1723
發表於 2010-4-9 18:10
由886轉5507,只不過張架露順8代換9代,冇意思..
w00tw00t
發表於 2010-4-9 18:21
回復 24# hw1723
4308 up去5507 由前便3隻active speaker轉去7隻active玩 full bal 現還在想{:6_146:}
w00tw00t
發表於 2010-4-9 18:30
本帖最後由 w00tw00t 於 2010-4-9 18:38 編輯
回復 25# w00tw00t
因為我要換後置,唔知換4隻mk後置先 ,還是前級加7隻Active..{:6_156:}而家出鴨記行下先....
hintel
發表於 2010-4-9 19:37
如果你由886換,一定試下byebye曰本聲啦,補多小小去換11a,包你完全唔同哂,呢個台都唔小ching換咗啦.. ...
hw1723 發表於 2010-4-9 17:40 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
好同意hw1723兄{:6_193:} ,有機會真是去試試cary 11a(效果真是好正),之前想換前級走去試(馬仔8003,rotel前級,onkyo 5507,cary 11a),
最終都是save多啲錢換11a(如果有錢換{:6_198:} ),不是onkyo 5507吾好(試完之後效果都好好,已經不再是onkyo以前聲底,動態大好多)但是不是好想要的,只有11a先比到我要多東西(但是個代價要比多一萬元{:6_200:} 同onkyo 5507比),所以onkyo 5507真是好底玩萬多元就有av 前級而且有front high同雙sub仔玩{:6_193:}
francis_leung21
發表於 2010-4-9 19:48
平價AV 前級ONKYO..中價:CARY, 高價:LEXICON..
當然可以諗埋其他廠既AV 前級...依家愈黎愈多廠出佐HD AV 前級...除佐KRELL/SUNFIRE 等等...好多歐洲廠都出佐..但係試既人唔多...去SHOWROOM 都試唔真...因為..一部機你SET 得好同差已經唔同...最好就係問用家REVIEW
7隻有源唔係唔好...但係後置多數要掛WALL...大隻+重係佢既問題
alzard
發表於 2010-4-9 19:50
其實Cary 呢D相對冷門野﹐第時要放係咪好難呢?
w00tw00t
發表於 2010-4-9 20:52
聽各C兄講出離都興奮{:6_212:} 唔好話去聽.有機會做多D家訪先...
marvintai
發表於 2010-4-9 21:26
回復 23# nwwedmond
Seem that we are having the same target....
If you can borrow 5507 from any ching, you can test 5507 + XPA-5 + MK S-150 in my house....{:5_87:} {:5_76:}
claero
發表於 2010-4-9 21:32
回復hw1723
4308 up去5507 由前便3隻active speaker轉去7隻active玩 full bal 現還在想 ...
w00tw00t 發表於 2010-4-9 18:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
i think 886 not real balance , waste money for cable and speaker as well . if u want real balance ,try 11a .