回復sunboy
謝謝
civic 發表於 2011-6-8 12:55 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
潛越了........{:6_136:}
本帖最後由 阿正 於 2011-7-1 14:03 編輯
我選擇master 1：1or CDR master
回復 132# 阿正
SACD播SACD肯定靓声~~关键不是人人都有SACD机，所以我都是投LPCD~~
大陆柏菲的ORMCD，用开盘母带+LPCD45片基逐张录的，也很不错~
本帖最後由 brotherkei 於 2011-8-11 15:04 編輯
I care more about who mastered it and which company manufactured it. The material of the disc has mu ...
raxel 發表於 2011-4-19 17:41 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Raxel c-hing, I agree with you completely!
When a Hi Fi enthusiast buys XRCD/LPCD/K2HD/AQCD etc etc, he expects to hear a difference (improvement) in sound in order to justify his purchase. Therefore the label must do something to make a difference. But very often Hong Kong labels can do very little to improve the sound due to one or more of the following reasons:
1. The first generation master tape is lost due to terrible archiving practice, or unusable because of poor maintenance.
2. The engineers know very little to transfer the master tapes properly.
3. The engineers do not know of good re-mastering practices.
4. The labels do not have a budget for re-mastering even in the absence of the above factors.
But since the HK labels want to milk their back catalogues again and again with all these XRCD/LPCD/K2HD/AQCD etc etc. What do they do? They just apply EQ, compression and all sorts of tricks (MSG) to old masters to make them sound different! In order to make the sound clearly different, they'll apply a lot of this MSG. Those who thought they made a right choice in buying these XRCD/LPCD/K2HD/AQCD etc etc will think the difference in sound is an improvement! For me, I only found the majority of them having terribly unnatural, bloated sound.
I've seen successes in many of the western artists remastering projects, such as the Beatles, ABBA or Carpenters. There are also good re-issue labels in the US or Europe who give genuinely amazing result. They only need to do this re-mastering once, if it is done properly. We do not need to buy the same title over and over again inXRCD/LPCD/K2HD/AQCD etc etc -- this phenomenon only implies that none of these efforts is remotely close to the best! Remember, all these are essentially CDs, and the main difference in sound lies on the mastering quality.
Raxel c-hing, I agree with you completely!
When a Hi Fi enthusiast buys XRCD/LPCD/K2HD/AQCD etc e ...
brotherkei 發表於 2011-8-11 15:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Thank you for your thorough explanation.I bought a HQCD Katie Melua and sound just the same with her normal cd version.As you've mentioned, no need other crazy version once the mastering is done so good in the first place.You seem to know so much about the music industry, do you rekcon univerisal cd is a rip-0ff?
為甚麼冇人選擇近萬六元張的玻璃CD???{:8_365:}
仲有 dmm
https://www.stockfisch-records.de/pages_art/sf12_dmmcd_e.html
本帖最後由 luckyperson 於 2024-1-2 14:32 編輯
人類聽覺係統（耳及腦）不能分別超於20bits44.1kHz的聲音。
小弟有 mp3，16/44.1(CD) ，24/48，24/96，24/192，24/352.8（DXD) ，DSD64(SACD)，DSD128 及DSD256等的音樂files。
小弟也有多聲道的 SACD或其ISO files，多聲道 DVD-Audio 及 多聲道藍光碟（含 auro-3D ，Dolby Atmos 或 3D影像) 。
錄音（例如DDD) 及其工程師，演譯，收放音響設備，remastering，視聽者心情/年紀/學養/買價等都會影響音樂感受。
網上有很多免費（可能要看廣告）mp3音樂files可下載。CD有大約90％資訊我們聽不到（聲頻太高太低，mp3只不過把這些聽不到資訊刪掉。
話題令我聯想到安徒生《皇帝的新衣》故事 ， John Cage 《4'33''》樂章，及 Masaki Batoh 腦波音樂。
P. S. 人類或其後代可能通過BCI(brain-computer interface) 及其它科技擴闊其感官範圍，甚至達到不滅（包括digital immortality) 。我認為人類自滅機會更大。
