sk555
發表於 2010-3-6 18:17
ching講嘅就係exactly我嘅感覺
chrisclw 發表於 2010-3-6 14:16 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I had the same feeling too. I tried with King Kong, it was so weak....
chrisclw
發表於 2010-3-6 18:32
I had the same feeling too. I tried with King Kong, it was so weak....
sk555 發表於 2010-3-6 18:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
五姐你套後置係邊隻?
sk555
發表於 2010-3-6 18:46
本帖最後由 sk555 於 2010-3-6 18:49 編輯
五姐你套後置係邊隻?
chrisclw 發表於 2010-3-6 18:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
My rear is JM Lab sib.Its performance is surprised me.
Sometime can feel the bass thru surround...so nice.
I'm using Velodyne 1200 ultra, don't know which caused that effect...
maner394
發表於 2010-3-6 21:02
我自己用OS3,包圍感強之餘亦聽到很多detail。如果用Klipsch RS-42,貼牆的話出黎的效果應該會不大理想, ...
kan 發表於 2010-3-6 17:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
絕對同意師兄所講,個人口味先决,所以現在我用緊Klipsch RS-42,都係貼牆咁掛,效果也得理想,因我個人比較喜歡實在感覺,所以買任向器材,一定要自已親自去試聽,找出想要的聲音,耳仔收貨為準!
girbaud
發表於 2010-3-6 22:01
我唸對後置掛上牆 或用腳架玩, 聆聽空間都有影響...
另外...係 amp 入面 set 返高後置 db 又有幫助...
好似我用 mirage nanoset prestige :
聆聽空間唔算好大,
用腳架,
set 大返 db...
除包圍感外, 都好埋身 同埋爆{:6_136:}
siuwing
發表於 2010-3-6 23:48
mk surr 55,一步到位~!
chrisclw
發表於 2010-3-7 01:16
My rear is JM Lab sib.Its performance is surprised me.
Sometime can feel the bass thru surround... ...
sk555 發表於 2010-3-6 18:46 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
That's nice setup! {:6_182:}
chrisclw
發表於 2010-3-7 01:22
mk surr 55,一步到位~!
siuwing 發表於 2010-3-6 23:48 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_121:} ching..點會知道我都有呢個諗法??? 不嗰日問過價,超哂budget..所以而家無考慮
chrisclw
發表於 2010-3-7 01:39
我自己用OS3,包圍感強之餘亦聽到很多detail。如果用Klipsch RS-42,貼牆的話出黎的效果應該會不大理想, ...
kan 發表於 2010-3-6 17:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我嗰日都有聽過RS-42,比我部nanosat係多d底音,不過德X嗰擺位唔係貼牆. 所以我應該會再去通利再試下OS3...
MarkMak
發表於 2010-3-7 01:42
尋晚再睇MJ This Is It,先發覺我對OMD-5後置出到幾低音,有D驚喜{:6_208:}
5吋低音單元