avmilk
發表於 2010-2-26 11:16
推B&W用bi-amp一定好d, 反正你用5.1, 有二個ch吉左..
jasonbiker
發表於 2010-2-26 12:13
3隻先啦....用對JBL 做後玩住先
有$都買int. amp. 先
都係多得你唔少啦....haha ...
micma 發表於 2010-2-26 11:03 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
81行Bi-amp應該推得好對CM1啦!
如果想聽歌方面有改善, 不如諗買部CD player仲直接。
babuwa
發表於 2010-2-26 15:34
I think you need to pay double price of CM1 to buy an Integrated Amp in order to push CM1 well...... CM1 is not expensive, but you need to pay much more to buy a good amp, that's the problem.
mightyatoms
發表於 2010-2-26 16:40
Congratulations micma hing...
you have to buy int amp for CDs....
I used to use bi-amp function if 81, thought that was good enough, but when i had a cheap int amp, it already has a significant improvement....
the sound is "dry" while playing CDs by 81
sk555
發表於 2010-2-26 17:19
81行Bi-amp應該推得好對CM1啦!
如果想聽歌方面有改善, 不如諗買部CD player仲直接。 ...
jasonbiker 發表於 2010-2-26 12:13 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
yes, source is important{:6_193:}
francis_leung21
發表於 2010-2-27 01:41
快d 出report 先...用cm1 前置感覺如何
sk555
發表於 2010-2-27 01:43
快d 出report 先...用cm1 前置感覺如何
francis_leung21 發表於 2010-2-27 01:41 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
he has new post la..see below
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=31747&fromuid=5954
ooh_hide
發表於 2010-2-27 02:29
恭喜...恭喜...{:6_195:}