我計計下
cht-8q $3600
amp $3000
計埋對前置都成一萬
買住2.1, 遲d加中置同後置, 咁玩得唔得?
so0072002 發表於 2010-1-29 21:28 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
yes , this is smartbecause if the quality was not good enough then u need to upgrade again .or find second hand
我計計下
cht-8q $3600
amp $3000
計埋對前置都成一萬
買住2.1, 遲d加中置同後置, 咁玩得唔得?
so0072002 發表於 2010-1-29 21:28 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
買住2.1, 遲d加中置同後置, 咁玩得唔得? 得，點解唔得呀{:6_177:} 不過係咁見議你買607(因為507同607都差幾多吓)
我本來也想買Denon AVR-1610 , 覺得靚仔好多
但睇過d報告平均都係507好些, 睇戲真的 Denon AVR-1610 好些嗎?
if 好少聽歌 may be denon or pionneer av amp with klipsch , polk audio ,jbl or nht will get better result . woofer just follow c hing was fine .
claero 發表於 2010-1-29 21:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
差千4蚊, 值不值呀師兄?{:1_259:}
買住2.1, 遲d加中置同後置, 咁玩得唔得? 得，點解唔得呀{:6_177:} 不過係咁見議你買607(因為507同607都差幾多吓)
rlwk2009 發表於 2010-1-29 21:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
線方面又點買法泥?
差千4蚊, 值不值呀師兄?{:1_259:}
so0072002 發表於 2010-1-29 21:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
值，607有1080升頻，又有得玩前7.1及Bi-amp。
線方面又點買法泥?
so0072002 發表於 2010-1-29 21:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
先用住D普通嘢，到玩一排後睇吓欠D嘜嘢，然後再換都未遲。
if u compare movie part , denon will have better dynamic for sure , onkyo will good in sound quality but if u are not interested in music , there's no point to buy it , pioneer will have more detail than denon and onkyo for sure , dynamic will better than onkyo but less thandenon . and also pioneer sound field was good as well , onkyo sound wall was more simple compare to pioneer .this is about your taste ...depends which part was important to u {:6_222:}
本帖最後由 so0072002 於 2010-1-29 22:45 編輯
我很喜歡kef iq10的外形, 這喇叭如何?
我覺得衣度d師兄真係好好, 其他av論壇都冇嘜點回的
我很喜歡kef iq10的外形, 這喇叭如何?
我覺得衣度d師兄真係好好, 其他av論壇都冇嘜點回的
so0072002 發表於 2010-1-29 22:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我都有同感，依度D Ching 好好多{:6_128:}
