bbbaba
發表於 2010-1-21 10:07
聽過 parasound 隻a23, a52 都無感覺, 可能a51先得, ching 試聽下先買好d
roica
發表於 2010-1-21 12:11
我都想知 pioneer 應唔應該配返 class D 後級
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 13:17
我係兩次projector demo shows到,
聽过Y記Z7推B&W 800 hometheater series,
勁到不得了,{:6_212:}
完show後, 問下在場打碟哥哥仔,
Z7有冇加後級,
佢話"冇", 直出喇叭,
我當時半信半疑,{:6_141:}
如果係真,
各位 ...
ryanenen 發表於 2010-1-21 09:30 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
EQ power {:1_343:}
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 14:06
本帖最後由 claero 於 2010-1-21 14:14 編輯
in my case, I'm using Z7 to push all 7ch(CM7, CMC, 686 & surround), I can say that it's just 推得到 not 推得好D, so what do u think, can u adv any power amp which is suitable for my case. if budget i ...
ricoy288 發表於 2010-1-20 20:41 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
first of all , u need to play with the EQ ,i used 3800 with power amp before , if u really want an "real" upgrade, not only change the sound quality or style , u need at least 150w or over for my own experience ,especially on movie part , cd part will be much easier to hear the different .z7 power part not that bad , i did try compare 3800 with 300 x5 power amp vs yamaha z11 , and the result was the dynamic can win z11 but the detail will lose n surround will lose as well .
i owned rotel 985 and parasound a23 before,in this case i will choose rotel because the price different was double but perfomamce not that far .how about add a second hand 2 channel power amp ? if z7 push less 2 channel , i m sure it will perform better as well, if u buy a 5 channel power amp in lower grade ....i rather buy a higher grade 2 channel power amp , thats what i will consider .{:1_352:}
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 14:22
Not just the sonic performance.
The dynamic and sound stage is great.
If just the EQ adjustment, that really big a difference!
ryanenen 發表於 2010-1-21 14:12 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
of course the room and placement was important ....but EQ was the most .{:1_352:}
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 14:25
本帖最後由 claero 於 2010-1-21 14:34 編輯
Hi C-hing, any comments in Adcom compare with Rotel ?
kleehkg 發表於 2010-1-21 14:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
adcom style was bright at high notes and crystal clear , rotel was thick and more bass but high notes was darker compare to adcom , the dynamic almost the same , depends match with which speaker but i guess they are both good enough to go .
chhanthony
發表於 2010-1-21 14:26
first of all , u need to play with the EQ ,i used 3800 with power amp before , if u really want an "real" upgrade, not only change the sound quality or style , u need at least 150w or over for my o ...
claero 發表於 2010-1-21 14:06 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
RB985 + A23 ...同我一樣{:6_208:}
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 15:57
i guess it would be fine . if the price was almost the same , it won't be very much different , only the style , like england amp nad , the music part wil peform in a different way .{:1_352:}
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 16:04
Fully understand with many thanks ! {:1_254:}
kleehkg 發表於 2010-1-21 15:58 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
u welcome la ......{:1_352:}
claero
發表於 2010-1-21 16:05
RB985 + A23 ...同我一樣{:6_208:}
chhanthony 發表於 2010-1-21 14:26 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
chhanthony hing :
when can i visit your svs ar?