本帖最後由 SonSon 於 2018-4-2 13:12 編輯
iwc 發表於 2018-4-2 01:33
最靚pan個人覺得，不過無好多人想要嘅Dv!
HDR 優點: 免費開發, 容易普及.缺點: 只可接受一套數據, 唔可以因應場景局部優化
Dolby Vision 優點: 採用動態數據, 可以因應唔同場景進行優化. 可向下兼容HDR. 缺點: 付費使用, 如samsung, panasonic拒絕比錢就唔駛旨意有DV
作為消費者, 梗係傾向想畫面更加艷麗更details, 點會理生產商點諗{:6_146:}
lawterry 發表於 2018-1-6 13:55
我12月頭買左sony 65A1.我選SONY 原因1.我用開SONY,喜歡佢的顔色同處理器.佢的真實解像 超強.畫面有質感（ ...
Sony得個半殘dv，而家都唔攪得掂！
本帖最後由 ernietse 於 2018-6-3 16:13 編輯
日本要清舊貨抵到爛¥480490, 同埋個機背靚仔冇咁多無謂嘢{:8_376:}
ernietse 發表於 2018-6-3 16:11
日本要清舊貨抵到爛¥480490, 同埋個機背靚仔冇咁多無謂嘢
好抵喎！不過水貸冇保用
- Choice of Sony and Panasonic is primarily Dolby Vision vs a longer warranty, assuming you do not have a specific preference for one brand's picture quality over the other, and is not too concerned with the price difference (if any)
- Note that 2018 OLED models (FZ950, A8F) with a new panel is more resistant to burn in.
師兄如果比我選，我會用Panasonic 。唔計之前個部Panasonic 55吋比咗人仲用緊成9年plasma .加自己用緊個部65吋plasma過了5年保都仲未壞，鮮色如昨天，我都想佢死我換部1000 新機。
有時冇Dolbyvision唔使死㗎，反正HDR plus 都嚟緊一濶三大。現在夠晒玩啦。
似前我好鐘意好鐘意Sony ，但近幾年太多Bid 貨搞到自己個brand 差晒，你用4-5萬買新貨，唔夠半年個friend bid 一部回來半價都唔使又新。所以佢個Sony做差晒。最主要我的friend 買佢電視好似以前三叔咁，一日條理到黑，所以我唔會再掂S牌。
以上，衹是個人真心用後意見
HDR10+ is not in the UHD disc spec.Even if it is added in the future, it won't be usable on current TV because HDR10+ requires HDMI 2.1, which is absent from 2018 TV.For current TV, HDR10+ is only possible for streaming video content such as Amazon Video.
本帖最後由 ernietse 於 2018-11-11 04:58 編輯
久候多時! 終於等到4K入屋!
用4K上網的確好精彩! 個遙控又正!
Pana 你係得嘅!!! {:8_376:}
wklie 發表於 2018-6-4 21:25
HDR10+ is not in the UHD disc spec.Even if it is added in the future, it won't be usable on curren ...
Ching, HDR10+ only require HDMI 2.0b..唔需要 HDMI 2.1的。
https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1504871066
