wklie 發表於 2017-7-20 01:21

本帖最後由 wklie 於 2017-7-20 01:23 編輯

rtings:
http://i.rtings.com/images/distance-fov-chart.png

Get the 55A1.

bigair 發表於 2017-7-20 02:32

我都係6呎距離,睇緊65”,感覺良好{:8_389:}

MSZ 發表於 2017-7-20 03:43

睇TBB嘅話65就會好辛苦。

kuushun 發表於 2017-7-20 03:56

55吋a1好啲   隻眼冇咁攰

chhanthony 發表於 2017-7-20 13:20

HDR - THE REALITY & ASSOCIATED ISSUESThe biggest issue with HDR displays is they can actually be painful to watch, due to what is often termed as excessive eye fatigue...The problem is the difference between the human eye's huge Dynamic Range, which has a dynamic contrast ratio of around 1,000,000:1, or about 24 stops, and the eye's static dynamic range.It is the eye's dynamic adaptation capability that enables us to see detail in dark environments, as well as in bright sunlight.However, at any single given time the human visual system is only capable of operating at a fraction of this huge range. It is this static dynamic range, which occurs when the human visual system is in a state of full adaptation, that is active when watching home TV and some theatrical presentations at 'normal' viewing distances. While there are few exact figures for the human eye's static dynamic range, many agree it is around 10,000:1, for average viewing environments, which is around 12 Stops.http://www.lightillusion.com/img_li/human-eye.gifhttp://www.lightillusion.com/img_li/human-eye-adaption.gif
Additionally, the human visual systems adaptive response needs to be taken into consideration - the time it takes to adapt between dark scenes to bright scenes, and vice versa, with bright to dark transitions typically taking many minutes to adapt, while dark to bright adaptation is significantly quicker, but still often measured in many 10's of seconds, if not minutes.This is easy to experience by looking out a windows from within a dark room, and panning your eyes from the window to within the room. The room detail slowly resolves itself as the eye adapts to the change in brightness.Further, with the relatively small size of TVs, combined with the standard viewing distance - 3m or so - the whole TV screen is within the high-acuity, central angle of view of the human eye (5° to 15°), meaning the human visual system cannot respond independently to different areas of brightness - being stuck within a state of full adaptation, so the viewer is only able to use the static dynamic range of the human eye.To actually gain benefit from the concept of HDR the actual viewing angle the display would need to occupy would be in the order of 45°, which with an average large TV of 55" would means sitting just 65" from the screen.
(See also the section on 'Resolution'.)http://www.lightillusion.com/img_li/viewing_position.jpgDo you really sit this close to your TV?What all this really means is a display with an excessive HDR will potentially cause real eye fatigue at normal viewing distances, and will very likely be be painful to watch.

chhanthony 發表於 2017-7-20 13:31

本帖最後由 chhanthony 於 2017-7-20 13:33 編輯

45° 大約 =

diagonal measurement =1.2 /Distance
Distance = diagonal measurement * 1.2/12

leekcj23 發表於 2017-7-24 00:19

已入Z9D,等送貨。。。。。希望吾好太壓迫啦
頁: 1 2 [3]
查看完整版本: 65" 定 55" ?

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。