rayvicky
發表於 2017-6-15 22:29
keke323 發表於 2017-6-15 20:56
我細佬一個月前都買左 65 7300
其實我都係3個星期前買了 UA65KS7300
性價比一流
cd6sir
發表於 2017-6-15 22:38
今晚落咗百記, 睇咗成個鐘, 心大又心細, 最後敗咗部 LG 65SJ8500
keke323
發表於 2017-6-15 23:08
rayvicky 發表於 2017-6-15 22:29
其實我都係3個星期前買了 UA65KS7300
性價比一流
之前有諗過 LG E6 ...但個價實在太貴了 {:6_168:}
java2
發表於 2017-6-15 23:52
cd6sir 發表於 2017-6-15 14:15
AV LIFE 有 65UH8500 陳列機 $12XXX, 不過得1年保養.
1年保養我又驚驚地
陳列機日開夜開唔好啦.
java2
發表於 2017-6-15 23:54
小小Pat 發表於 2017-6-15 15:38
Samsung no Dolby Vision而 LG有……
4K BD 主要係HDR10
java2
發表於 2017-6-15 23:55
我都係最近換49KS7300, 性價比高
marco
發表於 2017-6-16 11:14
55"KS9800都平左好多{:1_343:}
SonSon
發表於 2017-6-16 11:45
java2 發表於 2017-6-15 23:54
4K BD 主要係HDR10
但將來會係Dolby Vision世界{:6_143:}
wklie
發表於 2017-6-16 12:18
http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/samsung/q7f
(KS7300 is similar to KS8000)
Samsung KS8000 LED TV vs Samsung Q7F QLED TV
Overall, our new QLED 2017 TV scores worse than all our KS* from last year, but not by much. Here are the notable differences with the KS8000.
Q7F has better design/build quality
KS8000 gets significantly brighter, especially in SDR (528 nits for KS8000 in 50% window vs 317 nits for Q7F)
KS8000 has better native contrast (6906:1 vs 5020:1)
Q7F has better response time, especially 0% to 20%
Q7F bigger color volume and gamut (roughtly 5% better)
Even at the same price, most people would be slightly happier with the KS8000.