似乎結論係:
等安橋部後級出咗之後,要搞多次~
我部amp推1對CM7咋,其他c r 都唔大食,應該唔驚
我估要drive9隻 B&W要加後級喇,果2隻woofer唔要得la,換2隻JL/DD就差唔多
初期去揾amp同spkr時,try過N次onkyo配CM7同9,我覺得無乜cinema feel...concert都可以,1007 30 ...
sk555 發表於 2009-11-27 02:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
咁你真係要快O的攪掂套O野, 放我地上去聽下{:6_124:}
48# chhanthony
都好喎, 感受下金耳朵應有既組合效果!
subwoofer 唔係 b&w 既強項
買 sub 仔一定唔好諗佢
琴晚有事唔得閒去 ( 無得聽部 5007 )
{:6_136:}
我都覺得d聲比較矇
分析力唔太高、而人聲也是比較矇同實左一點
應該都係關b&w未開聲同埋難推的關係
而最大影響係兩隻十仔又真是唔太夠力
照看5007應該唔係e個水平 ...
鐵心心 發表於 2009-11-27 01:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
琴晚遲到....無機會認識到 鐵心心 tim ..{:6_126:}
琴晚遲到....無機會認識到 鐵心心 tim ..{:6_126:}
大玩偶 發表於 2009-11-27 13:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Hehehe... M&K stuff...
琴晚遲到....無機會認識到 鐵心心 tim ..{:6_126:}
大玩偶 發表於 2009-11-27 13:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_136:} 我認識到你咪得囉HAHA下次準時D喇{:6_138:}
主要無O左大家期待嘅爆得好勁, 而B&W厚聲底中高唔係好似JM Lab咁清 + 難推所以 = 矇
而果兩隻十仔真係....... 我好本來都好期待Star Trek兩架飛船爆光速飛行嘅震撼
點知.....O 晒咀......直情好似係無聲出......
...
chhanthony 發表於 2009-11-27 00:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
i guess may be not the power problem . thats the style of onyko, i m onkyo user before , onkyo selling point would be the sound quality ,the sharp and crystal clear high notes . the dynamic part will lose to denon was normal ,some people like peaceful sound , i won't pefer the new 5007 will perform in a different way like denon .
我贊同你既論點。但昨晚個情況，我個人都覺原凶係個場地、幫凶係 B&W 既 sub 仔! 已 607 為例，點解咁多師兄覺得係個地地表演比 5007 更理想 ... 好大可能，607 能量剛好 fit 到間房，反之 5007 就因為旗艦機種，能量自然相對大好多。間房全是木板間出來，無法承受而產生過多諧震。另外，B&W 既 sub 仔其實係呢方面都唔係專長，一向效果都唔太理想，所以都要考慮改用其它品牌黎玩。
我認為，要有效表演到呢款高階型號既真正威力，現在可能只有轉場地試試或下定決心重新裝飾過間房，做多些配套改善問題。
i guess may be not the power problem . thats the style of onyko, i m onkyo user before , onkyo selling point would be the sound quality ,the sharp and crystal clear high notes . the dynamic part wi ...
claero 發表於 2009-11-27 17:15 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
In my home, 5007 is evenly more dynamic than my previous 4308A.
{:6_127:}
