avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 12:32

MK M7 vs LCR36

Hi every c-hings here. Wish to buy a set of small mk speakers. Does any c-hing has comment of M7 and LCR36? Which one is better?

avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 15:13

I saw the small speakers at the Miro showroom in Central, placing next to M7. The sales said it was LCR 36. He said it was the small version of LCR750. So, no matter it is MK or M&K LCR36, it think it is available in Miro.That day, another c-hing was testing the 350 subwoofer and no one could be available to give me the test. So, I wish to know whether any c-hing here has compared the M7 with LCR36. Thanks so much.

timlee672 發表於 2009-11-23 16:04

要細喇叭就要用M7,因為細得黎可去到80周+-2db(數字上好過750),而且又靚仔DD{:6_174:}

avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 16:11

sorry for my ignorance, does 80周means it handles 80 hz above and what does +- 2db means?

timlee672 發表於 2009-11-23 16:49

sorry for my ignorance, does 80周means it handles 80 hz above and what does +- 2db means?
avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 16:11 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

睇返LCR 36已經無得買嫁啦,睇落M7好似係LCR36嘅新款(不過36規格好似錯左){:6_175:}
至於80周既問題我覺得幾重要嫁,因為通常以THX標準,80周做分頻係比較有利(80周樓下比sub仔出,樓上就喇叭出){:6_146:}


M-7音箱技术规格
单元结构:         1 x 1吋钕磁铁丝质超轻量化霓虹高音单体
2 x 4吋中低音
响应频率:         80Hz - 20KHz ± 2dB
阻抗:        4 ohms
分频器:         Phase Focused
承受功率:        200瓦 RMS以上
建议扩大机功率 :         10 - 150 WATTS
尺寸:(高宽深)         33 x 12.5 x 16.3cm

LCR-36 音箱技术规格
单元结构:        1 x 1吋高音, 1 x 2 吋中低音
响应频率:           80 Hz to 23 kHz, ± 2 dB
阻抗:        4 ohms
承受功率:           25-200watts
尺寸:(高宽深)        24.1 x 9.8 x 14.6 cm
重量:        2.27kg / 每只

avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 17:11

Thanks c-hing for the detailed information. But solely by the figures, seems LCR 36 has wider frequency respnse (80 hz to 23 khz) than M7 (80 to 20khz). I know you said LCR36 should be from 100hz and there should be a mistake. If I set the cross over of the Sub at 100 hz so that all 100 hz below goes to the subwoofer, would it be the same or still better to set it at 80hz?

Also, I really saw the LCR36 at Miro showroom next to M7, so I thought both of them should be available for testing. If they no longer sell LCR36, they should not put it inside the test room wo...

avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 17:23

米樂的 LCR36 可能是陳年陳列品, 新 MK 已經沒有 LCR36, 要小喇叭就 M7 喇........{:6_182:}
hkp1196 發表於 2009-11-23 17:06 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

I see.... I like M7 also. Just found out from the sales that LCR36 was the mini version of 750 (what he said was "同750 一樣咁狠") and saw that it was even smaller than M7, so want to know more about it. Seems not many C-hing had used LCR36 before.

avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 17:41

The sales said LCR36 and M7 were at the same level. LCR36 was more 狠, while M7 more balanced.

hkp1196, I have never used MK speakers before and is new here. I know you are a specialist of MK speakers, do you mind to tell what is your comment about the performance of M7? Thanks

IDM 發表於 2009-11-23 18:18

小弟係m7用家,如果又要細而只用黎睇戲,可安心使用m7,但性價比的確不高。

avbadboy 發表於 2009-11-23 18:24



S-150, 750, M7 我都聽過, MK 所有喇叭都適合用嚟睇戲, 但相比之下, 750 會比較埋身, 感覺較狠勁, M7 就相對比較斯文, 如果鍾意聽演唱會, M7 會比較適合, 至於 LCR36 就未聽過, 俾唔到意見.
不過老實講, LCR36 真 ...
hkp1196 發表於 2009-11-23 18:10 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

Thanks so much for the valuable comments.Agree that better to make appointment to test both at Miro. Just that it is so busy these days, even don't have the time to send the car to have regular service.
頁: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: MK M7 vs LCR36

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。