depeche_lam
發表於 2009-10-31 12:13
淨睇40~42寸電视, 新PS3夠啦,
PS3畫質係42寸TV 同blue ray player 分別会好少
但 PS3 C/P值高过其它齋blue ray机
ryanenen 發表於 2009-10-31 12:03 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
sorry我用46吋...講笑咋..唔好見怪..重有我成日都見有其它師兄講c/p值..其實係乜黎嫁
LauChungChung
發表於 2009-10-31 12:17
唔洗心大心細
買2-3k的blu-ray機只會後悔... 除非一上去到denon 4010... but $$$...
一於PS3 Slim啦﹗
depeche_lam
發表於 2009-10-31 12:27
咁又要諗計點入屋啦
stewartsvsuser
發表於 2009-10-31 12:34
PS3 Slim唔比一般入門機差
depeche_lam
發表於 2009-10-31 12:35
PS3 Slim唔比一般入門機差
stewartsvsuser 發表於 2009-10-31 12:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif我只係諗比ps3平
djaddy
發表於 2009-10-31 12:37
Ps3 no bitstream. U will regret if you buy that now. Might as well go for Philips 7300.
My 2 cents.
depeche_lam
發表於 2009-10-31 12:52
哦! 46寸又吾同啦!..
要諗下部好D 既blue ray player la...哈哈
c/p值即係 cost (成本)/performance (表現或功能既) 比例
即係成本小, 功能多, 咁c/p值為之高,
其實兩樣野除吾到, 点計比例???{:6_176:}
有錯請指 ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-10-31 12:48 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif哦明白曬啦..呢個世界.邊到有比小小收多多啦...而家呢部amp都諗咗好耐啦..2日
skhgc
發表於 2009-10-31 12:53
去馬啦!{:6_222:}
depeche_lam
發表於 2009-10-31 12:54
去馬啦!{:6_222:}
skhgc 發表於 2009-10-31 12:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif呢到的師兄真係好毒呀{:6_140:}
timlee672
發表於 2009-10-31 12:59
底遲早都係呢條路,不如早早上路{:6_134:}