《星球大戰：原力覺醒》STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS
本帖最後由 Nolan 於 2015-12-18 01:27 編輯I was fortunate enough to watch "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" on the first day of the release as I didn't have to work today.
As a loyal fan of Star Wars, I had already watched all the episodes when I was only fourteen. You think that was easy for me? No! It's certainly not! My parents always got very unique perspectives on the movies that I watch, they reckon the series is too immoral(might be they saw Anakin try to kill his master and chop his son's arm), so I rarely have a chance to watch them at home, unless they go somewhere else. That's also the reason why my childhood was thoroughly tragic.
Before watching "The Force Awakens", I thought it would be the best sequel of the year when I heard it's directed by J.J. Abrams(Mission: Impossible 3, Star Trek), I had faith in it, but lamentably, it's not what I thought, it just let me really down.
I'm aware of that many spectators pan the prequel trilogy heavily but praise the original trilogy, but that's not the way I see it. First of all, the actions of choreography did evolve substantially in the prequel trilogy, the lightsabre duels got much more spectacular and swift, unlike the orignal instalments, the cast all performed prominently. Despite the plots of "The Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones" being mediocre, "Revenge of the Sith" did succeed in delivering an emotional story and a perfectly edited sword fight, it made the prequel end beautifully. Personally, I like the prequels more than the originals.
I watched "The Force Awakens" a few hours ago, I didn't fancy it, and I considered it less compelling than all the previous episodes aside from "Attack of the Clones". Why would I say that? The story telling is not innovative enough, the dialogues are a bit jumble, the screen writers merely introduced new characters and adopted the old elements from the original trilogy but didn't explain enough of why the Clones could resuscitate, where Kylo Ren's evil master comes from...there seems too many things inexplicable. And also, there's only a few action sequences, they're even toothless and poorly edited. The thing that made me vexed was, why Luke Skywalker(portrayed by Mark Hamil) only got a cameo but the actor's name was on the top list? I felt myself deluded!
Even though "The Force Awakens" is far worse than I expected, there's still something encouraging. The casting is immaculate, at least all the actors coulddeliver decent performance and there's a very touching friendship between the characters. The very last thing I wanna tell you is, if your're a great Star Wars fan like me, then go for it, at least it ain't trash!
Rating: 70/100 isquare imax 剛睇完，非常失望！如果不是starwars想信巳中途離埸{:1_336:}故事拉得太長，没有一埸戲令你會覺得振奮{:1_349:}女主角做得不錯，鏡頭攝影角度不錯{:1_253:}LUCAS真係高佢幾班！ Oh no 仍逃不過宿命？ching咁講，導演想將風格再次重回星空奇遇，重點描述友情？期待呢個導演的或會感恩，期待電影的想必然離棄吧？執人手尾真係好難攪，跟返之前風格又無新意，攪其他又會俾人講都唔係原著，著重戰鬥又係無內涵
我不是星迷，但喜歡看電影尤其戰爭類的都想入場支持下，但近年乃得太多野了，看看其他人評價作參考都好，起碼有心理準備{:1_332:} 本帖最後由 lamwaikit007 於 2015-12-18 09:16 編輯
我未睇。
但回想 當年 星球大戰上映時，即現在的第四集，其實都有好多迷團都冇解開到便完結。去到第五集尾段才知道 Luke 是 黑武士的兒子。去到第六集才知 莉亞 和 Luke 是 兩兄妹。
今時今天，我們有機會一氣過看晒頭6集，便可能出現有先入為主的感覺，以為第七集一開Ball便將所有30年來發生的事件披露晒。
所以，呢幾年有機會重看的話，我都是 按番 次序 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3 去看 star wars。 今次用3D版係好決定，故事有追看性，希望這個後續三部曲能夠有個好劇本去完滿這個系列。另外，$55 真係抵睇，張戲飛及劃位方式令人懷念。 我今天早上看了,
感覺kylo ren和dark vader不同,是個成長型boss...(另外被Bowcaster打了一槍能站起來算不錯了)
我比較在意他進dark side的原因和他背後的boss是誰
作i為新系列的第一集,拋除starwars這個名,我覺得也有8.5/10
當然作為不算太合格的starwars fans,我會給100000000000000000000/10{:6_122:} 今集留下好多問題{:6_146:}kylo ren我一早估到佢身世,反而女主角個身份....{:6_175:}同原力好有緣的家庭.....只有skywalker......唔通佢係.... kylo ren....比想像中...."無用"....{:6_198:}無原力清潔員都可以傷到佢{:6_211:}.....佢只能殺害老人.....{:6_203:} Its a live Cartoon movie {:1_253:}
(Post76 Android 手機版送出) 無想像中咁正
故事好大程度上借鑑a new hope
福伯角色定位同Obi 一樣{:1_336:}
kylo ren壓迫感從佢除頭盔開始無哂，似前傳Darth Vader一樣
luke變咗yoda咁(從今集咁睇)
John Boyega做嘅Finn仲以為佢可以同kylo ren有得打
點知唔係…{:1_339:}
特技算係頂尖
飛機戰拍得幾緊張
光劍格鬥…好過前傳第二集
自己咁排star wars
6>3>5>4>>7>1>2