HenryHou1 發表於 2015-5-8 17:37 static/image/common/back.gif
巴閉
不如出個叮噹教學﹖
你又轉咗乜Q嘢雙線﹖行車嗰啲﹖...
對喇叭由 "聲高Y" 轉行 "敗Y"...{:6_235:}
教學我無資格...報告/分享都會減少
因為哩度有D人...講佢又唔聽...講完佢又問
仲要加句"你真係當我唔知呀 / 謬論"(但係又好明顯係唔明我嘅真正意思)
既然係咁...我咪出少句聲囉...{:6_136:}
ilavbnm 發表於 2015-5-8 17:47 static/image/common/back.gif
對喇叭由 "聲高Y" 轉行 "敗Y"...
教學我無資格...報告/分享都會減少
因為哩度有D人...講佢又唔 ...
咁大鑊{:9_418:}
但我想學喎~{:6_128:}
HenryHou1 發表於 2015-5-8 17:51 static/image/common/back.gif
咁大鑊
但我想學喎~
我只係一個謬論友...咩都唔識...{:6_148:}
HenryHou1 發表於 2015-5-8 17:51 static/image/common/back.gif
咁大鑊
但我想學喎~
From Dyna Excite Manual
Bi-wiring/bi-amping
Dynaudio loudspeakers feature a carefully fine-tuned cross-over, optimized using
selected parts and an advanced circuitry to achieve a truly balanced and smooth
frequency response. Therefore, dividing the frequency sections through bi-wiring or
bi-amping is neither beneficial nor optional.{:6_159:}
ilavbnm 發表於 2015-5-8 17:54 static/image/common/back.gif
我只係一個謬論友...咩都唔識...
你講........我信架{:8_379:}
小寶老豆都會信{:8_380:}
xerxeshowie 發表於 2015-5-8 17:56 static/image/common/back.gif
From Dyna Excite Manual
Bi-wiring/bi-amping
每間廠都有佢地嘅理論...邊樣啱口味就用邊樣囉...何必深究...{:6_138:}
本帖最後由 HenryHou1 於 2015-5-8 18:00 編輯
xerxeshowie 發表於 2015-5-8 17:56 static/image/common/back.gif
From Dyna Excite Manual
Bi-wiring/bi-amping
我係想問佢點擺位，唔係想講single or biwire
另外本來係想問佢轉咗咩喇叭線，唔係問咩係bi wire
點都好唔該晒
印象中dyna好少出biwire喇叭，好似無
HenryHou1 發表於 2015-5-8 17:56 static/image/common/back.gif
你講........我信架
小寶老豆都會信
假得你吖...{:8_370:}
HenryHou1 發表於 2015-5-8 17:59 static/image/common/back.gif
我係想問佢點擺位，唔係想講single or biwire
另外本來係想問佢轉咗咩喇叭線，唔係問咩係bi wire
點都好 ...
間間廠都有自己一套設計標準/理論
膽機要用輸出牛...好似係常識
但係一樣有廠家堅持膽機無輸出牛係更好
亦有廠家連石機都有輸出牛
標準/理論...算啦...自己中意緊要D...{:8_368:}
ilavbnm 發表於 2015-5-8 17:47 static/image/common/back.gif
對喇叭由 "聲高Y" 轉行 "敗Y"...
教學我無資格...報告/分享都會減少
因為哩度有D人...講佢又唔 ...
邊Q個夠膽串我哋最愛既多拉A濛~~??!! {:9_433:}
