進 擊 的 三 角 形 5*
進 擊 的三 角 形 5*{:6_174:}http://www.whathifi.com/triangle/esprit-titus-ez/review 三角形音效都吾錯 ! Triangle,好喇花來~ {:6_183:} 本帖最後由 xerxeshowie 於 2015-4-4 21:52 編輯
Tomy 發表於 2015-4-4 21:17 static/image/common/back.gif
Triangle,好喇花來~
But Dyna is best{:6_157:}
http://www.post76.com/wordpress/?p=7941
xerxeshowie 發表於 2015-4-4 21:48 static/image/common/back.gif
But Dyna is best
http://www.post76.com/wordpress/?p=7941
Dyna歷屎耐好多,
當年不少高檔音箱用Dyna單元
同分音器。 Tomy 發表於 2015-4-4 22:28 static/image/common/back.gif
Dyna歷屎耐好多,
當年不少高檔音箱用Dyna單元
同分音器。
I am not talking about history war{:6_175:}
{:6_159:} I mean both Sonic/Music Presentation and Technology Wise la
If you compare to Magico Q1 or Wilson Benesch Endeavour ( Not Wilson Audio ! ), Dyna is just like toy jar{:6_126:}
http://magico.net/Reviews/Q1/Q1_01.php{:6_157:}
http://wilson-benesch.com/2014/04/endeavour-loudspeaker/{:6_157:} {:6_158:} {:6_139:}
Magico Q1
Wilson Benesch
諗都唔敢諗啦 {:6_244:} Tomy 發表於 2015-4-4 23:36 static/image/common/back.gif
Magico Q1
Wilson Benesch
No Harm to think war,
If you not buy a car,
You can buy either one ma,
The hardest problem is what amps to power them ???{:6_174:}
頁:
[1]