mistaleung 發表於 2015-2-26 17:56

後置Tips分享

係AVS見到有人分享
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/89-speakers/874378-surround-speakers-bipole-dipole-quadpole-omnipole-one-2.html

大家可以參考下, 當然要睇番實際空間環境

1) IF surrounds are within 7 feet, then dipoles and bipoles are preferred.
2) IF more than 7 feet away, then monopoles are at least equal.
3) Any full range surround that moves much air such as a floorstander is preferred (even if you have to mount them on the roof or up on the sidewall! - just how serious are you about your sound?)
4) Multiple side monopole speakers offer by far the most improvement. More than moving from monopole to dipole or bipole.
5) Positioning side (not rear) monopoles firing over the head of listeners were considered inferior.
6) Dipoles have a narrow edge over bipoles. This appears to be material dependent. If explosions, rain etc. If single voice, then the other way round.
7) Having to switch speaker mode depending on material - not for me.
8) Using different speaker brands for main LCR > disliked.
9) Using different speaker brands for surrounds > hardly noticed, unless mixing point source and electrostatics.

試下譯做中文比大家睇

(1) 如果surround < 7尺 , 用dipole/ bipole 比較好
(2) 如果surround > 7尺, 用單向比較好
(3) 單元愈大愈好
(4)
(5)   ---- 唔識譯---
(6)
(7)
(8)前中置最好同牌子
(9)後置唔同牌子唔太大分別

MDLP 發表於 2015-2-26 19:21

LCR 是指 左中右

eddychoy04 發表於 2015-2-26 22:12

即係話我聯合國都唔係咁大問題啦。{:6_184:}

RayTsang3812 發表於 2015-6-24 21:21

謝謝師兄分享
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 後置Tips分享

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。