Nolan 發表於 2015-2-20 16:45

"JUPITER ASCENDING" is up to scratch but worse than a popcorn film

本帖最後由 Nolan 於 2015-2-20 22:00 編輯

JUPITER ASCENDING is the second film plays by Channing Tatum that had to be postponed due to adding the 3D effects since G.I.JOE: RETALIATION, but both of them have one thing in common, they are poorly received.

JUPITER was set to release in 2014, however, WB thought if they repackaged it into a 3D action flick, it would be lucrative. Unfortunately, JUPITER doesn't do well at its boxoffice, now only reaches $96 million worldwide despite WB has spent $176 million on it . JUPITER seems gonna be a financial failure.

As a spectator, I never care how the films perform at their boxoffice, the only thing I care is what the films deliver me. For instance, WATCHMEN which was directed by Zack Snyder, was a financial failure, but what it gave me is an immaculate story and professional actors, it's one of my favourite super hero movies.

The directors of THE MATRIX TRILOGY directed JUPITER, they were brothers, but since the bigger one got through a transexual surgery, they became sister and brother!!
The actors perform well, the plot is too naive and unrealistic, there's a raft of CGI, but the film looks like a computer game more than what it's supposed to be.

To conclude, JUPITER ASCENDING is barely up to scratch.

alleelarry 發表於 2015-2-21 00:10

3D or 2D !?

Nolan 發表於 2015-2-21 01:06

alleelarry 發表於 2015-2-21 00:10 static/image/common/back.gif
3D or 2D !?

3D!!

Nolan 發表於 2015-3-2 17:43

頁: [1]
查看完整版本: "JUPITER ASCENDING" is up to scratch but worse than a popcorn film

重要聲明：本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作，Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等，不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見，並非本網站之立場，讀者及用戶不應信賴內容，並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下，讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限，故不能完全監察所有留言，若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題，請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 )， 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利，如有任何爭議，管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論，敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。