34# JKC710
JKC710 hing, why not?
ikkjr 發表於 2009-11-16 01:39 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
死啦.......我愈睇愈唔明..........DOUBLE RUN係咪每聲道要2條SFH PX主線, 跟住主線1既四條芯扭埋一齊做"+", 主線2既四條花扭埋一齊做"-"??
(我喇叭無四線分音, 即係玩唔到BI-WIRE同BI-AMP)
死啦.......我愈睇愈唔明..........DOUBLE RUN係咪每聲道要2條SFH PX主線, 跟住主線1既四條芯扭埋一齊做"+", 主線2既四條花扭埋一齊做"-"??
(我喇叭無四線分音, 即係玩唔到BI-WIRE同BI-AMP) ...
JKC710 發表於 2009-11-16 01:51 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Should be 2條SFH PX主線 (Red & purple 扭埋一齊做"+", blue & white 扭埋一齊做"-")
奇纜店都有SFH PX. 不過50/ft{:6_199:}
我都一舊雲
乜bi-amp double run唔係要8絛PX咩?
4絛PX行bi-amp係single run?
如果4絛PX唔行bi-amp先係double run?
本帖最後由 mightyatoms 於 2009-11-16 11:09 編輯
我都一舊雲
乜bi-amp double run唔係要8絛PX咩?
4絛PX行bi-amp係single run?
如果4絛PX唔行bi-amp先係double run?
juniorx 發表於 2009-11-16 10:57 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
ching, you are right,
but that ching's speakers are not bi-wire.... so cant bi-amp but if double run, only total 4 pcs of SFX is fine...
ching, you are right,
but that ching's speakers are not bi-wire.... so cant bi-amp but if double run, only total 4 pcs of SFX is fine...
mightyatoms 發表於 2009-11-16 11:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Right. That ching's speakers are not bi-wirable, having only two terminals for connection.Bi-wirablespeaker should have four terminals (two positive, two negative) on the back of the bi-wirable speaker.
點解今日我D舊文俾人搵番晒出黎回舊post嫁...{:6_199:}
each side, 2 pcs double run for bi-amp
mightyatoms 發表於 2009-11-15 23:58 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
OIC.... Thanks~~~{:1_253:}
點解今日我D舊文俾人搵番晒出黎回舊post嫁...{:6_199:}
googleli 發表於 2009-11-16 11:38 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
好明顯係秋風起............
好明顯係秋風起............
JKC710 發表於 2009-11-16 12:58 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
舊蛇都要翻閹.....
