sharkpigyu 發表於 2014-8-24 19:21 static/image/common/back.gif
真的可以? 我揀r700其中一個原因係個單元大啲 好鬼十五十六 我問個兩個朋友 一個話r500 一個話r ...
r500 is exactly same.size as.r200
guess.r700 is better but see see yr living room.first
(Post76 Android 手機版送出)
pac 發表於 2014-8-24 20:01 static/image/common/back.gif
R700的承受力是200W,而CA 851a是合拼機120W。right?我l覺得可以用大功率些的後級吧 ...
120w rms into 8 ohms
200w rms into 4 ohms
Pac ching 甘樣spec算唔算夠推呀?
homealone 發表於 2014-8-24 20:30 static/image/common/back.gif
我也是R700用家，之前试听了R300, 500和700才决定R700.R500的bass下沉力比R700和R300都所不及，够位的 ...
我度個個位 夠放r700 只係驚甘細聆聽環境唔適合玩座地!但我又好想玩 所以上來請教各ching!{:6_136:}
davidngkwok 發表於 2014-8-24 20:32 static/image/common/back.gif
r500 is exactly same.size as.r200
guess.r700 is better but see see yr living room.first
好想同我隻r200親番一set呀!{:6_134:}
本帖最後由 pac 於 2014-8-24 20:47 編輯
sharkpigyu 發表於 2014-8-24 20:34 static/image/common/back.gif
120w rms into 8 ohms
200w rms into 4 ohms
Pac ching 甘樣spec算唔算夠推呀?
http://kef.com/html/en/showroom/hi-fi_series/r_series/fact_sheet/Floorstanding/r700/index.html
R700是8抗阻呀。後級功率不夠推喇叭，會購成控制力不足，低頻會肥左出來的
pac 發表於 2014-8-24 20:45 static/image/common/back.gif
http://kef.com/html/en/showroom/hi-fi_series/r_series/fact_sheet/Floorstanding/r700/index.html
Ching 甘樣我咪又要換int amp?{:6_147:} {:6_147:} {:6_147:}
本帖最後由 pac 於 2014-8-24 21:22 編輯
sharkpigyu 發表於 2014-8-24 21:05 static/image/common/back.gif
Ching 甘樣我咪又要換int amp?
哈哈！毒海無崖呀{:6_174:}
CA 851A是class d後級，CLASS D後級實際輸出功率會較CLASS A及AB大的，所以都未必好差的，如果你,心想買R700咪試左先囉{:6_138:}
pac 發表於 2014-8-24 21:11 static/image/common/back.gif
哈哈！毒海無崖呀
甘pac ching有咩好介紹?又可以match番我部ca 851c?{:6_136:}
sharkpigyu 發表於 2014-8-24 21:18 static/image/common/back.gif
甘pac ching有咩好介紹?又可以match番我部ca 851c?
如果用700加兩隻spl1000，不敢想像，自己喜歡就得，但系你得65呎，呢個系主要考慮因素
如果真系用700，考慮下krell300
