Einstein
發表於 2009-9-1 01:52
A: 灌材
A2: 黑幼鋼沙
B:對象
B1: 電源線
C: 效用
C2: 屏敞作用
C3: 其它
唔知啱唔啱呢? 沙王...
adafong28 發表於 2009-9-1 01:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
師姐...唔明...你以為答選擇提呀..1A , 2B, 3C...{:6_123:} 比d意見得唔得姐...?{:6_134:}
鐵心心
發表於 2009-9-1 01:55
整條黎試用下先會有意見{:6_175:}
Einstein
發表於 2009-9-1 02:24
整條黎試用下先會有意見{:6_175:}
鐵心心 發表於 2009-9-1 01:55 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
OK...good point...找HKP 黎一場..
302冇灌沙 v 302灌石英沙
jessica
發表於 2009-9-1 11:11
你係馬交Fan wor...
Einstein 發表於 2009-9-1 01:49 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我都知我係有D馬交Fan -__- '..
Einstein
發表於 2009-9-1 20:47
好丫.......不過記得唔好用 L 頭..........{:6_237:}
hkp1196 發表於 2009-9-1 19:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我部TV 掛牆...要用 L 頭.........{:6_147:}
245141525
發表於 2009-9-1 21:41
我只識灌水.............{:6_138:}
hkp1196 發表於 1-9-2009 01:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
效果係加分升級............{:6_174:}
hkp1196 發表於 1-9-2009 19:46 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_199:} {:6_199:}
{:6_171:}
Einstein
發表於 2009-9-1 23:39
L 頭好多機都用唔到喎............{:6_126:}
hkp1196 發表於 2009-9-1 22:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
無法...如果唔係到我玩唔到了...唔怕, 我仲有好多石英沙線, 不如就...
Northwire vs Northwire
245141525
發表於 2009-9-2 18:01
o岩喇.......一個字都無, 淨係整幾個表情圖案, 就係最佳灌水示範, 大家俾 d 掌聲 245141525 兄.............{:6_237:}
hkp1196 發表於 1-9-2009 22:57 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
......{:6_197:}
你贏......{:6_150:}
Einstein
發表於 2009-9-2 23:48
1# Einstein
use anything the heavier and smaller the particles the better,呢句金句沙屏敝鼻祖Virtual Dynamics既阿Rick講既
Einstein
發表於 2009-9-2 23:54
the theoretical basis behind:
1) 鋼沙 is heavy so it can do better on vibration and stablization BUT 鋼沙 is a bit big and cannot fill up all the holes
2) charcoal might absorb harmful emf...and it's so refine that it can fill up all the rooms where 鋼沙can not reacher...charcoal might be a bit light weight on its own
so mixing might optimize the benefit of both