Bi-wire or Bi-Amp
其實Bi-wire 好啲定係Bi-Amp 好啲?7.1 Amp 行5.1 計. Bi-Amp +Bi-wire 5.1 好啲{:1_253:} bi-amp, 自己都用緊, 包你冇後悔 Bi-Amp +Bi-wire 5.1 好啲{:1_253:}
jessica 發表於 2009-8-3 19:14 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實Bi-Amp 都係用兩對喇叭線比一隻喇叭, 已有Bi-Wire作用.
不過想知行 Bi-Amp 會唔會好啲. me using Denon 4308A AV amp Front Channel pre-out >> Audiolab 8000S + 8000P Bi-Amp + Bi-wire Sound from heaven II Tri-Run >> Linn Katan Bookshelf.Bi-amp + Bi-wire can produce more transparent and more powerful sound.
Basic 7.1 setup:
Centre: DIY Altec 8" + Ribbon Tweeter
Surround: Klipsh RB61
Back surround: Tripole Speaker
Subwoofer: MK KX-12SF
BDP: Pioneer 051-FD I mean using the Bi-amp function of my AV Amp without addtional amp. I know it is not a true Bi-amp. That's why I want to know the effect.
Thank you. I mean using the Bi-amp function of my AV Amp without addtional amp. I know it is not a true Bi-amp. That's why I want to know the effect.
Thank you.
hklin 發表於 2009-8-3 19:39 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我都係用av-amp玩bi-amp，真係有明顯分別的，反而純玩bi-wire就分別不大
我都係用av-amp玩bi-amp，真係有明顯分別的，反而純玩bi-wire就分別不大
kan 發表於 2009-8-3 19:51 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
等我都試先. 不過如果用一條4心喇叭線行Bi-Amp有冇問題?
等我都試先. 不過如果用一條4心喇叭線行Bi-Amp有冇問題?
hklin 發表於 2009-8-3 19:57 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
理論上冇問題，但效果應該冇分兩條線玩咁好 先試睇效果先, 好先大興土木. 反正現時重用緊十年前的Audioquest Crystal Hyperlitz喇叭線.
頁:
[1]
2