chrisfd7695
發表於 2009-7-6 13:33
現在真係 1516{:6_126:}
本來想買 2809,近來又想睇下 51,71 or 876,
但後兩個選擇己超出預選{:6_146:}
simon
發表於 2009-7-6 14:27
哈哈 ~ 我頭一部 av amp 係先鋒 , 最後三部係天龍 ~ {:6_195:}{:6_195:}{:6_195:}
cakecake
發表於 2009-7-6 14:39
我理解為AB数功放有力D, 所謂"埋身", 是指喇叭出声力度勁D, 所以有"埋身"感覺
而"成個人走左入套戲入面 , ", 我覺得係各声道調較得宜令包圍感提升, 所以好似你自己係現場咁. 吾関class AB 或class D事. 如Class A ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-7-6 14:05 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實包圍感唔關部amp係用邊類,
反而要埋身和狠勁, D類應該重勁, 因為聲音收放夠快, 衝擊感自然夠
其實LX71和81較51包圍感好...好大原因係Full Band Phase Control和Phase Control既分別
alzard
發表於 2009-7-6 15:01
其實包圍感唔關部amp係用邊類,
反而要埋身和狠勁, D類應該重勁, 因為聲音收放夠快, 衝擊感自然夠
其實LX71和81較51包圍感好...好大原因係Full Band Phase Control和Phase Control既分別 ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-7-6 14:39 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
But I doubt if you test in shop, will the shop really tune the AMP before giving you a try?Or it is a matter simply of the hardware difference only.
cakecake
發表於 2009-7-6 15:09
But I doubt if you test in shop, will the shop really tune the AMP before giving you a try?Or it is a matter simply of the hardware difference only.
alzard 發表於 2009-7-6 15:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Alzard兄有見地....{:6_193:}
睇佢今期sell邊部la....
其實小弟家中有第一代HD AV amp---Pioneer VSX-LX50, VSX-LX60..
的確, 用Full Band Phase Control既LX60包圍感完勝用Phase Control既LX50..
聲音亦較厚暖...但埋身程度就真係差不多...
maner394
發表於 2009-7-6 15:18
我理解為AB数功放有力D, 所謂"埋身", 是指喇叭出声力度勁D, 所以有"埋身"感覺
而"成個人走左入套戲入面 , ", 我覺得係各声道調較得宜令包圍感提升, 所以好似你自己係現場咁. 吾関class AB 或class D事. 如Class A ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-7-6 14:05 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
又學到野{:6_193:}
cakecake
發表於 2009-7-6 15:29
以我有限amp design 知識, AB類於小電流時, 行A類功放, 声音会滑同定,失真小. 到某额定電流時,轉B類功放,力度大增. 但存在AB類轉換失真.
計力度應為純A類為首,但最哂電又熱. 次為AB類. 至於D類因利用IC技術達到高 ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-7-6 15:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
icic...
多謝ryanenen兄指教{:6_162:}
claero
發表於 2009-7-6 15:55
以我有限amp design 知識, AB類於小電流時, 行A類功放, 声音会滑同定,失真小. 到某额定電流時,轉B類功放,力度大增. 但存在AB類轉換失真.
計力度應為純A類為首,但最哂電又熱. 次為AB類. 至於D類因利用IC技術達到高 ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-7-6 15:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
in my experience , class d always powerful enough and the best dynamic compare to a or ab , the only weakness was the sound quality , the sound can't be round as class a or ab .can say a little harsh, but may be it will improve soon because it still have a lot space to improve , the future may be take over by classs d if the sound quality improve saem as ab .like ICE POWER , they are one of the best company that have good skill for class d.
cakecake
發表於 2009-7-6 16:17
cake 兄, 吾好咁講. 倾下計啫.
依期pioneer大熱, 我尋日都8下走去試聽. 感覺同上次差不多. 分昕力高, 声底薄(吾怪得你話要tune亇100hz~200hzEQ).前後移動吾錯,可能你講個Full Band Phase Control有関.
我覺得phase ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-7-6 15:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
ryanenen兄,
MCACC既EQ設定入面100-200hz果度係比較低...真係唔知點解...
但一較番高D...成部amp即刻唔同晒...
所以先至話較番高D 100-200hz果度..
上次其實講漏左少少知料...{:6_136:} , 補充番先..
Full Band Phase Control其實係高中低音都會較正Phase...唔止低音..{:6_121:}
Phase Control就淨係低音
xx666hk
發表於 2009-7-6 16:28
真係獲益不小 {:6_193:}