chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-20 12:11 static/image/common/back.gif
http://www.review33.com/avforum/index.php?topic=49110309112204&page=1
(#912)
砧板達人{:6_193:}
師兄,編野去到122炸,冇912......
chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-20 12:11 static/image/common/back.gif
http://www.review33.com/avforum/index.php?topic=49110309112204&page=1
(#912)
ching,有同冇有咩分別?
interhuman 發表於 2013-3-20 12:41 static/image/common/back.gif
ching,有同冇有咩分別?
我只係轉貼唔係用家{:1_352:}
interhuman 發表於 2013-3-20 11:21 static/image/common/back.gif
師兄你果塊應該係竹砧版，
唔墊聲有無唔同？
Yes, it is 竹砧版.
After using it, I find the sound image more solid and sound more stable. When using beneath bookself speakers, the improvement is more significant and the bass response has more texture.
I tried other wooden-made cutting board before too, like Japan Tree, Buffalo. Their results are a bit better in those areas. But they are all in kitchens now!! In terms of C/P, I find 竹砧版 the best.
sokwan 發表於 2013-3-20 13:57 static/image/common/back.gif
Yes, it is 竹砧版.
After using it, I find the sound image more solid and sound more stable. When ...
音響世界真係無奇不有{:8_368:}
原來已經有師兄體驗緊，仲以為自己最先諗到{:8_386:}
interhuman 發表於 2013-3-20 17:40 static/image/common/back.gif
音響世界真係無奇不有
原來已經有師兄體驗緊，仲以為自己最先諗到...
我都諗緊用黑麻石定係木板{:6_194:}
ming 發表於 2013-3-20 12:28 static/image/common/back.gif
天上野既板 都係靚木製做
可能好多砧板嘅料靚過音響專用嘅什麼什麼木，
只要商人掛上某字眼或牌子便升價十倍了。
que 發表於 2013-3-20 17:44 static/image/common/back.gif
我都諗緊用黑麻石定係木板
入廚房搵塊＂神木＂試下先{:8_373:}
interhuman 發表於 2013-3-20 17:46 static/image/common/back.gif
可能好多砧板嘅料靚過音響專用嘅什麼什麼木，
只要商人掛上某字眼或牌子便升價十倍了。 ...
Agree!!!!{:6_142:}
咁直接放地板咪仲好，用成塊地的面積及密度去吸震，相信一定好過你用砧板。
