corolladv 發表於 2013-3-17 12:45 static/image/common/back.gif
???? but so fun to Ching
Experiment.
Have fun!
gxxrge 發表於 2013-3-17 23:11 static/image/common/back.gif
Experiment.
Have fun!
Gxxrge兄
Panasonic 係唔係有個功能可以唔加變鏡下出到2.35:1？
如有，有無比較兩個方法的分別？謝謝。
chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-18 00:39 static/image/common/back.gif
Gxxrge兄
Panasonic 係唔係有個功能可以唔加變鏡下出到2.35:1？
http://www.avforums.com/forums/projectors/1070909-exclusive-official-panasonic-pt-ae4000-thread-news-reviews-owners.html
Post# 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pecker View Post
Just to be a little bit of a pedant (purely for the sale of clarity) no home cinema set up is truly anamorphic in the way that systems are in the cinema.
In the cinema the image arrives already 'squeezed' on the film, and is then 'un-squeeze' it with the lens.
In the home set up a Blu-ray Disc is 'flat' ('un-squeezed') and has to be digitally manipulated to make it 'squeezed' so that the lens can 'un-squeeze' it.
A small difference, but as I say, just for the purposes of clarity.
Steve W
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I get your point Steve, but I just wanted to impress upon potential buyers that the AE3000/4000 do not have an anamorphic lens to un-squeeze any 'stretched' (by whatever means VP/PJ or even anamorphic DVD) image. Some people seem to have been confussed into thinking that the AE3000/4000 are doing something they are not and I feel it only fair to explain that it is only a convienient way to do the zoom method.
Sorry for dragging this thread off topic, hope that's answered the comments though, cheers.
chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-18 00:39 static/image/common/back.gif
Gxxrge兄
Panasonic 係唔係有個功能可以唔加變鏡下出到2.35:1？
One of the objective of my experiment is to find out the differences.
gxxrge 發表於 2013-3-17 23:11 static/image/common/back.gif
Experiment.
Have fun!
Sharing:
Show us your 2.35 LENS setups
