ckw3031
發表於 2012-9-25 15:35
回復 8# giseegoobi
師兄,你最终買了老麥?
giseegoobi
發表於 2012-9-25 16:03
回復giseegoobi
師兄,你最终買了老麥?
ckw3031 發表於 2012-9-25 15:35 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
是的,係kef display
ghostkam
發表於 2012-9-25 23:07
回復 1# andylam67
804D最好揾部300W以上嘅Amp去推,合拼好難去到呢個火數...
B&W陳列室都係揾部Classe 300W後級去推,感覺唔錯...
唔好諗,直上前後級啦
ghostkam
發表於 2012-9-25 23:19
回復andylam67
MA6300 .....因為我都係推B&W,小弟覺我不錯
不過我是新手
勿見奇 ...
giseegoobi 發表於 2012-9-25 11:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
MA6300??呢隻無McIntosh Autoformer喎...失去咗老麥嘅特色
推804D,MA6600我都覺得會幾吃力,莫講話MA6300...MA7000可能有啲機會,不過街鋪好難有咁嘅組合比你試
ghostkam
發表於 2012-9-25 23:26
回復 1# andylam67
CHing對喇叭係新入手?係最新Diamond版?小弟都睇咗呢對好耐,不過由於真係好難推所以未有行動,而家重諗緊點逐步Upgrade去前後級去推804D{:6_181:}
andylam67
發表於 2012-9-26 02:11
I tried 804D in their showroom with classe. well, my comment is, it's a very good amplifier, very musical and sweet... but not for rock/pop/hop hip, just like mbl, it's for classical.
the salesperson in B&W said this new 800 diamond series does not need very powerful amp because they have new design in the magnet. for 804D, he said 150W at 8ohm is already enough. of course, higher the better.
Lester
發表於 2012-9-26 10:21
I tried 804D in their showroom with classe. well, my comment is, it's a very good amplifier, very mu ...
andylam67 發表於 2012-9-26 02:11 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
佢意思係804D 易推過804S 好多? {:6_141:}
yoes
發表於 2012-9-26 11:11
May try Gryphon Diable
pp101
發表於 2012-9-26 11:28
B&W804D配金仔或chord會唔會好的呢{:6_142:}
manKi
發表於 2012-9-26 11:30
小弟口味上喜歡B&W 配A類 {:6_210:}
同意B&W Diamond 比預期易堆,現用緊805Di 只配A類20W都不錯
但804D 有3個6.5"中,低音單元,加上合併機選擇
建議試預範圍內,大功率AB類石機