論壇 › HiFi音響 › Fostex A8 dac

Frisby75 發表於 2012-9-4 13:47

Fostex A8 dac

有冇 c hing 用過呢部做 dac ? 可否比過意见?

http://www.fostexinternational.com/docs/products/HP-A8C.shtml

{:6_212:}

xanthony 發表於 2012-9-4 15:42

好靚仔{:6_178:}

Frisby75 發表於 2012-9-4 16:10

回復 2# xanthony


    但價錢都好靚仔 !$xxx

{:6_202:}

xanthony 發表於 2012-9-4 16:16

回復 3# Frisby75


    我自己用緊Dac magic plus 弟時up上去的話都預左必定過萬(除非二手),如果唔係應該無咩大ge提昇{:6_147:}

mac1 發表於 2012-9-4 18:04

回復 1# Frisby75


     已用梗.{:6_182:} if you don't mind it has no clock inputs and balanced output, then it is quite good. FYI, the Headphone Amp section is not bad as well!

Frisby75 發表於 2012-9-4 18:25

本帖最後由 Frisby75 於 2012-9-4 18:50 編輯

回復 5# mac1


謝謝

佢標榜自己係 Headphone Amp (正確是 "DAC Headphone Amp"), 主要不是標榜 DAC 功能

如果主要是比 Hi Fi 用, 不是比 Headphone 用又如何呢?

C hing 有冇經驗其他 DAC 如 PS Audio Digital Link III 或 Dac Magic?点相比?

小弟主要目的是比 Squeezebox Transporter 用出 Amp.    Squeezebox Transporter 個 DAC小弟感覺 OK但可能有改進空間(即係身癢)。

謝謝x2

{:6_204:}

mac1 發表於 2012-9-4 18:56

回復 6# Frisby75

I've never used the PS audio Link or Dac Magic... I can't compare the HP-A8 with them. For the DAC section, I like it too. It is detailed, transparent, lots of air on the top. Bass is quick and well controlled. Not a lot of Bass.. Vocal is natural and just a little bit on warm side.
整體來說是自然,淡定，不溫不火.不象美國機 這類聲... 
FYI, The above experience is only based on my headphones (not Speakers).
Hope it helps.

Frisby75 發表於 2012-9-5 00:22

回復 7# mac1

多謝意見

查看完整版本: Fostex A8 dac