論壇 › HiFi音響 › Esoteric K-05 & K-07

mchim3010 發表於 2012-6-20 10:40

回復 10# digiman


    K05 & K03係用唔同的cd transport mechanism~

babuwa 發表於 2012-6-20 14:31

Agreed K-05 has an edge of using the expensive VRDS-NEO VMK-5
CD transport mechanism (same as K-0 ...
digiman 發表於 2012-6-20 00:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


    $4X K buy VOSP transport......{:6_136:} {:6_136:}

mchim3010 發表於 2012-6-20 19:53

回復 12# babuwa


    K07同SA50其實差唔多，隨時只係個殼的分別~

babuwa 發表於 2012-6-20 21:53

本帖最後由 babuwa 於 2012-6-20 21:54 編輯

回復babuwa


    K07同SA50其實差唔多，隨時只係個殼的分別~
mchim3010 發表於 2012-6-20 19:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


    {:6_121:} {:6_121:} as least SA60 ar ma......{:6_176:} {:6_176:}

CKKeung 發表於 2012-6-20 23:29

Some Japanese prefer the cheaper K-07 to the more expensive K-05 :
http://www.ippinkan.com/eesoteric_k01_k03_k05_k07.htm
{:6_141:}

digiman 發表於 2012-6-21 00:57

回復 11# mchim3010

Yes, you are right ! Their cd transport mechanisms are slightly different !

K-05 :VRDS-NEO "VMK-5"mechanism
K-03:    VRDS-NEO "VMK-3.5-10" mechanism

mchim3010 發表於 2012-6-21 10:38

回復 16# digiman

系統夾的話，K03確係幾正{:6_193:} 一試難忘{:6_163:}

googleli 發表於 2012-6-21 11:05

K-01 都唔錯嫁 {:6_222:}
不如一步到位啦 {:6_222:}

ghostkam 發表於 2012-6-21 22:31

K-01 都唔錯嫁
不如一步到位啦
googleli 發表於 2012-6-21 11:05 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

...~130K...{:1_336:}

babuwa 發表於 2012-6-22 00:30

...~130K...
ghostkam 發表於 2012-6-21 22:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


    {:9_437:} {:9_437:}

查看完整版本: Esoteric K-05 & K-07