roger0101 發表於 2012-6-14 03:42

{:8_403:} 抵 la~!

digcom 發表於 2012-6-14 07:38

thanks , ching

Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 14:32

Hi all,

Just purchased the 212j yesterday. When I transfer the files from PC to 212j, the transfer rate is very slow, only 10MB/s, what went wrong? I already have an old 108j and the transfer rate is the same as 212j(about 10MB/s), it can not be right as I thought 212j will be a lot faster. Please help!

obee 發表於 2012-6-17 16:06

Hi all,

Just purchased the 212j yesterday. When I transfer the files from PC to 212j, the transfer...
Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 14:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


    What end-to-end LAN cable are you using ?

Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 17:21

回復 24# kenneth_obee

Hi Kenneth,

I am using all CAT6 LAN cables. Could it be the Router the bottleneck? My router is a few years old Belkin 150M router.

obee 發表於 2012-6-17 17:48

回復kenneth_obee

Hi Kenneth,

I am using all CAT6 LAN cables. Could it be the Router the bottlen ...
Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 17:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


    If your router not support gigabit Ethernet, even you use cat6 all the way it still just 100mbps. From what you said, it seems that you are not running gigabit network

Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 20:42

回復 26# kenneth_obee

Thanks. Now it is even slower at 3-4MB/s transfer rate. I will get a gigabit router next week. Any good router to recommend? Anyway it seems strange that the transfer rate is at such low i.e. 100MB vs 10MB or 3-4MB/s.

obee 發表於 2012-6-17 21:43

回復kenneth_obee

Thanks. Now it is even slower at 3-4MB/s transfer rate. I will get a gigabit ro ...
Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 20:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


    Fast Ethernet 100mbps is just 100/8=12.5MB/s megabyte in theory. This theoretical speed would never reached as there are overhead such as handshaking, parity, and packet headers of every layers of network protocols from network layer to application layer. Actual speed also highly depends on network quality especially collision (network congestion)

Hangaround 發表於 2012-6-17 22:27

回復 28# kenneth_obee

Hi Kenneth,

Thanks for your explanation. Looks like I will need to get a gigabit router. I may consider a dual band router as well so that I could have separate band for ipad and iphone. I thought my old 108j slow transfer rate was due to the NAS itself but it is actually the router that is the bottleneck.

babuwa 發表於 2012-6-18 16:30

{:6_143:}{:6_143:}
頁: 1 2 [3] 4
查看完整版本: 特價到月中,更係快0的買啦 ~~~

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。