90呎用座地會否太大,我會用書架. TAD2201, 3/5A etc.
個人認為Audiolab8200CD本身分析力好，但係本身牌子就有點淡。
KEF都系開揚，淡。所以兩個加起來。。。。
我都好像知道Audiolab夾什麼喇叭比較好。
另外，8200CD＋Q＋P。不如CDQ＋P會晤會效果差不多但係平D？
回復 12# chufelix
師兄你好,
Do u think Elac is good for classical?
i'm now using Audiolab 8200CDQ+P and KEF300.
i've been thinking of elac 244be or kef ls50.
many thx,
回復 13# dimsim
I tried LS50 in their showroom, impression was good. I think that sound better than the more expensive R300.
Very transparent and clean.
But that wasn't tried using Audiolab....so I don't know whether it matches with Audiolab and how will it sound.
(for the record, they used that bloody expensive MF to push it....)
Have not tried ELAC. If you try it, you let me know^0^
回復 14# chufelix
thank you c hing.
Just bought LS50 today.
Sound stage is bigger and more accurate than Q300, the improvement in mid band is obvious.
Hope they'll be even better after breaking in.
回復 16# dimsim
Congratulations!
what amp are you using? still the same Audiolab?
let me know how they match together
回復 16# dimsim
恭喜CHING,我都係Q100舊用家,抵玩但只屬入門,
隻LS50會唔會整編開箱文比我地大定見識下先{:8_390:}
整編開箱文比我地大定見識下 x 2
回復 17# chufelix
Same Audiolab 8200CDQ+P.
As a beginner, I don't know if they match or not. cos I do not have much experience of other speakers.
I can only tell the difference btw LS50 and Q300.
The image is more accurate, better soundstage and sound smoother.
Due to my limited experience, they sound fine to me.
