tomc
發表於 2012-3-29 18:48
回復appletim
有冇中文翻譯
qk8082900 發表於 2012-3-29 18:36 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
"之前已試過XQ10,滿意其表現。我會去試244,有無師兄知道街價?"
qk8082900
發表於 2012-3-29 21:18
回復 12# tomc
唔該哂{:6_162:}
smallkeung
發表於 2012-3-31 11:31
本帖最後由 smallkeung 於 2012-3-31 11:33 編輯
D2 100w 夠唔夠力推 Elac 244?
appletim 發表於 2012-3-28 19:16 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
D2 應該係120w
www.creekaudio.com/products/destiny2_amp.php
!替天行道!
發表於 2012-3-31 13:17
Hi, is ur bs244 running well? I find its mid range is still pretty stiff after 48hrs of continuous use., ppl say it takes a year to run in. Haha....dont know.剛購入 Creek D2 功放來配 Harbeth P3RSE. 已Run in over 200 hrs, 發覺呢個組合聲低較厚. 請問師兄如果小 ...
appletim 發表於 2012-3-28 08:35 http://m.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
edison133
發表於 2012-3-31 13:25
You can compare Elac 244 and 254 before buy!
avlam
發表於 2012-3-31 13:31
You can compare Elac 244 and 254 before buy!
edison133 發表於 2012-3-31 13:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
你有冇聽過對 254 呀 ?{:6_141:}
appletim
發表於 2012-3-31 13:33
D2 應該係120w
smallkeung 發表於 2012-3-31 11:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
However, it is MIC & the manual say only 100w for 8 ohms
appletim
發表於 2012-3-31 13:35
You can compare Elac 244 and 254 before buy!
edison133 發表於 2012-3-31 13:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Already bought 244, and very enjoy the music & drive with D2
appletim
發表於 2012-3-31 13:38
Hi, is ur bs244 running well? I find its mid range is still pretty stiff after 48hrs of continuous u ...
!替天行道! 發表於 2012-3-31 13:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
It solve the 厚聲 problem now,the salesman say the 244 needs to run in at least 300 hrs
appletim
發表於 2012-3-31 14:15
You can compare Elac 244 and 254 before buy!
edison133 發表於 2012-3-31 13:25 http://m.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Tested 253,but no 254 to test. Finally, feel 244 is better