由於規格上16/ ...
nicknick 發表於 2012-3-18 10:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
好多玩家都係睇啲表面嘢嚟買嫁啦！{:6_188:} 回復 10# nicknick
呢d又係關於Program算法既質素，同埋High-Cut 個位搞得好唔好了 你吾講我真係吾知呀!
如果套野jitter 控制得好係吾係升吾升都無咩所謂呢？
另外如果先用audi ...
Lester 發表於 2012-3-18 09:10 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
basically yes, but async upsampling is the cheapest way to reduce jitter, othe real effective way of de-jitter othen then async upsampling, mostly only could see in CDP up to at least $80K - $100K. 你吾講我真係吾知呀!
如果套野jitter 控制得好係吾係升吾升都無咩所謂呢？
另外如果先用audi ...
Lester 發表於 2012-3-18 09:10 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
basically yes, but async upsampling is the cheapest way to reduce jitter, othe real effective way of de-jitter othen then async upsampling, mostly only could see in CDP up to at least $80K - $100K.
upsampling the file is not the same, hardware async upsampling inside CDP or DAC is related to clock. basically yes, but async upsampling is the cheapest way to reduce jitter, othe real effective way ...
Wilmer威馬 發表於 2012-3-18 14:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
真係唔知喎.
馬爺,新舖開左未? 真係唔知喎.
馬爺,新舖開左未?
kenneth_obee 發表於 2012-3-18 15:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
開左一半 開左一半
Wilmer威馬 發表於 2012-3-18 15:06 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
咁玄?! 幾時開埋另一半?{:6_195:} 咁玄?! 幾時開埋另一半?
kenneth_obee 發表於 2012-3-18 15:10 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Next month 升頻從來都唔係用來補救或增加細節，升頻係利用異步方式減低 JITTER 同 LPF 部份唔洗響 20KHz 一刀斬，容 ...
Wilmer威馬 發表於 2012-3-18 01:52 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
GOOD GOOD GOOD{:1_351:} 本帖最後由 freeworld 於 2012-3-20 21:54 編輯
可能會有少少改善但未必明顯，也要留意升頻不一定好聲D。
nicknick 發表於 2012-3-18 00:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
上次個sales 吹加咗DAC, 用普通BDP play CD 都可以接近萬元CDP 質素......
{:6_132:}
頁:
1
[2]