回復 50# sokwan
Damping factor 會吾會係log scale咁上架呢？ 要加個零先係下一級
It should be a ratio of something as I remember, but I forgot the details. I heard that damping factor over 200 is already quite good for class A/B power amps.
I am waiting for master Wilmer's explanation!!
Nuforce said there is no meaning of damping factor for its power amps because of its special design, which I still could not understand why. But if what Nuforce said is true, damping factor might only apply to certain groups of amps.
回復Wilmer威馬
咁係吾係夾Elac 就吾好咁damp, 夾肥佬b&w 就damp 多d咁呢？ ...
Lester 發表於 2012-2-8 20:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
原則上係
Nuforce said there is no meaning of damping factor for its power amps because of its special design, ...
sokwan 發表於 2012-2-8 20:41 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
品牌自己講自己一定隱惡揚善，賣花讚花香，你試下去 DIYAUDIO 講同一翻說話呀！？肯定比人噓到 PAR 街！
"有 d 喇叭唔食電流，例如 3/5a，所以老燒會知道，用部舊 naim 可以推爆 3/5a，但用部大 Krell 可以推到一...
sokwan 發表於 2012-2-8 20:16 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
無得知，靠試，因為喇叭廠唔會比哂所有 SPEC 你睇。
回復sokwan
Damping factor 會吾會係log scale咁上架呢？ 要加個零先係下一級 ...
Lester 發表於 2012-2-8 20:22 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
自己 SERACH 下啦，總之基本野我講哂，再深入唔係幾句說話或一、兩個 POST，真係上堂架啦！
回復 57# Wilmer威馬
Yeah sir{:6_239:}
Thanks a lot for Wilmer's explanations.
I think I have to do more research myself and take some time to learn some circuits theory in the future.
w數只供參考,加埋前級增益已改變好大,例如audio research前級增益攞得好盡,單講以前用audio note m1及audio research sp9兩部前級推同一部後級,m1要開到11點先夠聲,sp9開到8點半已經夠聲
