ANWKLO 發表於 2012-4-28 10:35 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Yes, I love uk speaker much. For my speaker, Change to mono block of caspian will not improve much comparing with change brand. And upgrade to mono block also suggest upgrade to M1 pre amp... Yes, I love uk speaker much. For my speaker, Change to mono block of caspian will not improve ...
fightclub 發表於 2012-4-28 13:39 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I am not sure whether change to Caspian mono block will or will not have much improvement comparing with change brand with the same budget. Some Caspian mono block users suggest Integrated amp drive HF and mono block push LF with huge improvement. Is upgrade to mono block must also upgrade to M1 pre amp{:1_342:}
Caspian mono block is much better than Caspian bi-amp in terms of better power, 85 watts vs 100 watts, better damping factor, 140 vs 400 and better current output, 50 amps vs 80 amps. I am not sure whether change to Caspian mono block will or will not have much improvement comparin ...
ANWKLO 發表於 2012-4-28 14:30 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
yes, you are right. However my next upgrade should be other brand as i believe within same brand the surprising happiness will be relatively limited? 本帖最後由 ANWKLO 於 2012-5-13 11:28 編輯
yes, you are right. However my next upgrade should be other brand as i believe within same brand t ...
fightclub 發表於 2012-5-13 09:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
According to your experience and other users from UK, Taiwan, China and Kuala Lumpur, the significant improvement of M1 bi-amp is the extension of HF and LF while there is a little improvement in the controlling / driving ability.
Most experience users suggested upgrade to M1 mono instead of M1 bi-amp for the improvement is much better in terms of controlling / driving ability. In addition the my past listening of M2 bi-amp and M1 mono at the agent "覺得M1 mono推力充裕, 淡淡定定, 密度、質感、線條感比較好過單獨M1合併" while there is not much surprise for the M2 bi-amp. Thus, I give up the M1 bi-amp at the end.
The following experience of M1 bi-amp is from a user of Kuala Lumpur:-
“小弟目前用的是Nad 565BEE CDP + DALI IKON II SPK
經過一段時間的run in
我的 Caspian M1 Integrated + Caspian M1 Stereo Amp
似乎進入了狀態。兩頻的延伸變的更好以外，最近加了ZONOTONE電源線
及Oyaide 的RCA 後低頻有了明顯的進步（punch)的力度增加不少。
只能說每一天都在享受那旋律優美的音樂。
很多人都在談論甚至批評這樣的配對。。。。。。
我只能說這樣Once you try, you will know.
INTEGRATED來推高頻，STEREO堆中低頻。由於兩者都是85W個推一個頻道。對我的DALI IKON II來說是沒有明顯的推力增加，不過兩頻的延伸倒是好了很多”
http://i1219.photobucket.com/albums/dd430/SHINJOLIM1/_MG_3872.jpg
Hope you find a suitable amp for driving your Proac 1SC no matter change to other brand or stick to the same brand. BTW, my M1 monos are being delivered from UK. I will share my experience with you in the future.
Roksan Caspian M series bi-amp
恭喜！Ching,我想加咗部Amp對喇叭既control好咗好多。- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用 恭喜！Ching,我想加咗部Amp對喇叭既control好咗好多。
- 發送自我的 iPhone
pcheung 發表於 2012-5-13 17:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
師兄是指加一部M1後級還是一對M1 Mono{:1_342:} 回復 26# ANWKLO
Ching, 不論是Mono或Power Amp對控制力、高低伸延力都會好好多。 回復ANWKLO
Ching, 不論是Mono或Power Amp對控制力、高低伸延力都會好好多。 ...
pcheung 發表於 2012-5-22 22:22 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
一般以同廠同級計, Mono會比較好過Power Amp, 唔單只"控制力、高低伸延力都會好好多", 重有其他 ......... 小弟一直身痕加部Caspian M1 後級玩bi-amp, 看完這個post更加痕
因為代理沒有M1後級, 所以一直 ...
ANWKLO 發表於 2012-1-4 19:30 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
ching, What Hi Fi gives a very high rating to Roksan Caspian M2 CD Player. Would you consider to upgrade your CDP?
I am considering to change from Marantz Pearl Lite CDP to M2. Do you hink there is significant improvement? ching, What Hi Fi gives a very high rating to Roksan Caspian M2 CD Player. Would you consider to...
SkyGeo 發表於 2012-5-22 23:07 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Kandy K2 CDP同Caspian M2 CDP 兩者音色都係偏向高分析力/高頻, 尢其是後者更為明顯. M2分析力好高, 每一個音符粒粒精緻剔透, 充滿空氣感的高頻, 音場好像擴大了,相對來講, 中頻沒有Caspian M1 CDP那麼甜美同厚, 色彩稍淡一些. M2 CDP就唔係好適合我, 因為未聽過Peral Lite, 比唔到意見, 至於M2 CDP是否適合師兄, 要聽過先知道{:1_258:}